APHC010418212022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] THURSDAY, THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 26426/2022 Between: PATHAN SALEEMA,, W/O. NAZEER KHAN, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, R/O. 1ST LANE, NEAR WATER TANK, PAMURU TOWN AND MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT, A.P. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRL. SECRETARY. HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI. AMARAVATI. 2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, A.P. POLICE HEADQUARTERS, MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, A.P. 3. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, DISTRICT POLICE OFFICE, KURNOOL ROAD, SUJATHA NAGAR, ONGOLE, PRAKASAM DISTRICT, A.P. 4. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PAMURU POLICE STATION, PAMURU TOWN, PAMURU MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT, A.P. 5. THE SUBINSPECTOR OF POLICE, PAMURU POLICE STATION, PAMURU TOWN, PAMURU MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT, A.P. 6. PATHAN NAZEER KHAN, S/O. KHASIM KHAN, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, R/O. IRUVUR ROAD, PAMURU TOWN AND MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. SRINIVASA RAO NARRA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: 2 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “.... a Writ of Mandamus directing the Official Respondent authorities to scrupulously follow the conditions imposed by the Hon'ble A.P. High Court in CRLA No. 1077/2016 dated 30.04.2022 by the end and Order for stringent action against the SI of Police, Pamuru Town Police Station i.e., the Official Respondent No. 5 who altered the report without the knowledge of the Petitioner and mentioned simple sections instead of appropriate sections as per the original report given by the Petitioner.” 2. When the matter is taken up for hearing, Sri Narra Srinivasa Rao, learned counsel for the Petitioner would submit that they intend to withdraw the petition and hence the petition may be disposed of. 3. Sri V.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home would submit that the Court may pass appropriate orders. 4. In that view, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:13.11.2025 Dinesh 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.26426 of 2022 Dt.13.11.2025 Dinesh