CHANDRASHA S/O SIDDAPPA v. THE SPL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER
MSA/200117/2017 · 2025-07-22
M G S Kamal
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 58459 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 58459 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-K:4143 MSA No. 200117 of 2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, KALABURAGI BENCH DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF JULY 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.G.S.KAMAL MISCL SECOND APPEAL NO.200117 OF 2017 (LA) BETWEEN:
CHANDRASHA S/O. SIDDAPPA, AGE: 59 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O: HARKACHI, TQ & DIST: KALABURAGI. …APPELLANT (BY SRI. HARSHAVARDHAN R. MALIPATIL, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
THE SPL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER, FOR M & MIP, KALABURAGI – 585 102.
2.
THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, KNNL ID, IPC DIV NO.01 KALABURAGI. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. K. SHASHI KIRAN SHETTY AG A/W SRI K. MALLAHA RAO, AAG AND SMT. T. MAYA RAJANN, HCGP FOR R1;
V/O DATED: 01.10.2024 NOTICE TO PARTIES IS DISPENSED WITH)
THIS MSA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 54(2) OF LAND ACQUISITION ACT, PRAYING TO ALLOW THIS APPEAL WITH COSTS AND MODIFY THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD PASSED BY THE PRL.
CIVIL JUDGE, KALABURAGI DATED 21.04.1995 IN LAC NO.65 OF 1994 AND ALSO JUDGMENT AND AWARD OF III ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, KALABURAGI DATED 10.02.2011 IN LACA NO.236 OF 2010 AND FIX MARKET VALUE AT THE RATE OF RS.50,000/- PER ACRE AND AWARD ALL STATUTORY BENEFITS AND ETC.,
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR REPORTING SETTLEMENT THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
Digitally signed by SAROJA HANGARAKI Location: High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench, Dharwad
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-K:4143 MSA No. 200117 of 2017
ORAL JUDGMENT (PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.G.S.KAMAL)
The learned counsel for the appellant has filed a memo dated 30.6.2025. The memo reads as under: That in the present case this Hon’ble Court vide
judgment and award dated 19.02.2018 was pleased to enhance the compensation for the land acquired. The said award is already satisfied by the Respondent, further the amount proposed for settlement in the mediation and the amount awarded are similar. Hence the Appellant is satisfied with the amount already paid and the present appeal be closed as settled for the amount already paid by the respondents.
Hence this memo.
2.
Learned counsel appearing for KNNL does not dispute the same.
3. In that view of the matter, memo is taken on record, the appeal is dismissed having become infructuous. Sd/- (M.G.S.KAMAL) JUDGE VB/CT-ASC/List No.: 19 Sl No.: 22