APHC010010482022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] THURSDAY, THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION No. 661/2022 Between: L RADHIKA, W/O L.SHASHIWARDHAN BHOPAL, AGED ABOUT 35YEARS, D.NO. 17/825-A,TLLAK NAGAR, GUNTAKAL TOWN AND MANDAL, ANANTAPURAM DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, ANANTAPURAM, ANANTAPURAM DISTRICT 3. THE SUB DIVISIONAL POLICE OFFICER, GUNTAKAL TOWN AND MANDAL, ANANTAPURAM DISTRICT 4. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, GUNTAKAL URBAN, GUNTAKAL TOWN AND MANDAL, ANANTAPURAM DISTRICT 5. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, I TOWN POLICE STATION, GUNTAKAL TOWN AND MANDAL, ANANTAPURAM DISTRICT. 6. K SURESH BABU, SA) NOT KNOWN, SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, I TOWN POLICE STATION, GUNTAKAL TOWN AND MANDAL, ANANTAPURAM DISTRICT. 7. SANDEEP REDDY, , S/O NOPT KNOWN, GUNTAKAL TOWN AND MANDAL, ANANTAPURAM DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. P NARASIMHULU Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: 2 “.... a Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 2nd respondent in not initiating appropriate action against the 6th respondent is as illegal, arbitrary and violations of article 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the 2nd respondent to take necessary action against the 6th respondent forthwith.” 2. Sri V.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home would submit that, in the light of the interim order dated 07.01.2022 in I.A.No.1 of 2022 passed by a Coordinate Bench of this Court, no further orders are required in this matter. 3. Sri P.Narasimhulu, learned counsel for the Petitioner would submit that the Court may pass appropriate orders. 4. In that view, the Writ Petition is disposed of. Respondent No.2 is directed to look into the representation of the Petitioner dated 12.11.2021 and take appropriate steps forthwith according to governing rules and law. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:13.11.2025 Dinesh 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.661 of 2022 Dt.13.11.2025 Dinesh