Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 5845 (UTT)

MAHENDRA SINGH KASHYAP v. DISTRICT MAGISTRATE

WPMS/1210/2025 · 2025-05-15

Ravindra Maithani

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS 66D WPMS No. 1210 of 2025 Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J. Mr. Z.U. Siddiqui, Advocate for the petitioner through video conferencing. Mr. M.S. Bisht, Brief Holder for the State/respondents. The challenge in this petition is made to the rejection of petitioner for OBC caste certificate. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. On behalf of the petitioner, it was argued that his brother has been provided the caste certificate, but he has been denied without any reason. Learned State counsel was required to get instruction. Learned State counsel would submit that the petitioner did not file all the documents that were required for grant of caste certificate. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that he would file a fresh application enclosing therewith all the documents and further seeks direction that the respondents/authorities may be directed to take a decision on it afresh. Learned State counsel would submit that if such an application alongwith all the documents are filed by the petitioner, it may be decided within six weeks. The Court takes on record the statement made by learned State counsel. The writ petition is disposed of with the liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh application along with all the documents within a week with a further direction to the respondents/authorities to decide the application of the petitioner within six weeks (Ravindra Maithani, J.) 15.05.2025 Jitendra