APHC010014452017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3328] THURSDAY, THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1642/2017 Between: 1. PUDI RAVINDER, SRIRAMULU DIST. & ANOTHER, S/O. LATE RAMANAIAH, AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS, R/O. RAMATHIRTHARN VILLAGE, VDAVALURU MANDAL, SRI POTTI SRIRAMULU DISTRICT. 2. PUDI VENKATARAMOHAN,, W/O. LATE RARNANAIAH, AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS, RIO. RAMATHIRTHAM VILLAGE, VDAVALURU MANDAL, SRI POTTI SRIRAMULU DISTRICT.. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. K S JAWAHAR REDDY GUNTUR DIST 6 OTHERS, THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, PANCHAYAR RAJ DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. SRI D DAMODAR REDDY INCHARGE, SUPERINTENDENT OF ENGINEER, NATIONAL CYCLONE RISK MITIGATION PROJECT (NCRMP), PANCHAYATRAJ DIVISION, SRI POTTI SRIRAMULU DISTRICT. 3. SRI D DAMODAR REDDY, THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, NATIONAL:CYCLONE RISK MITIGATION PROJECT (NCRMP), PANCHAYATRAJ DIVISION, SRI POTTI SRIRAMULU DISTRICT. 4. SRI R MUTHYALARAJU, THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, SRI POTTI 2 SRIRAMULU DIST. 5. SRI MURALIKRISHNA, THE TAHSILDAR, VIDTIVALURU MANDAL, SRI PATTI SRIRAMULU DISTRICT 6. SRI MADHUSUDHAN RAO, RAMATHIRDAM VILLAGE, THE VILLAGE SECRETARY, VIDAVALURU MANDAL, SRI POTTI SRIRAMULU DISTRICT. 7. SRI T SUDHEER KUMAR, THE SECRETARY VARANI FARMER MARKETING SOCIETY, VIDUVALURU MANDAL, SRI POTTI SRIRARRIULU DISTRICT. ...CONTEMNOR(S): Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. G SRIDHAR REDDY Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE (AP) 2. GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ RURAL DEV (AP) The Court made the following: ORAL ORDER: None appeared for the Petitioner. 2. Sri Panku Rajesh Kumar, learned Counsel appearing for Respondent Nos. 1, 2 and 3, and Sri T. Sanjeeva Rao, learned Counsel appearing for Respondent Nos. 4, 5 and 6, have drawn the attention of this Court to the Counter-Affidavits filed by Respondent Nos. 1, 2, 3 and 5. 3. The Order passed by the learned Single Judge on 27.02.2017 in W.P.No.6004 of 2017 would indicate that the said Writ Petition had been disposed of with a direction to the Respondents not to interfere with the Petitioner’s subject land admeasuring Ac.0.50 cents in Sy.No.884 of Varini Dhandigunta (Ramathirtham Village), Vidavaluru Mandal, Sri Potti Sriramulu Nellore District. 3 4. All the Counter-Affidavits categorically state that the respective Respondents are not interfering with the possession of the Petitioner and that the construction is going on in Sy.No.885/2 as per the Mandal Surveyor’s Report, but not in Sy.No.884 of Varini Dhandigunta (Ramathirtham Village), Vidavaluru Mandal, Sri Potti Sriramulu Nellore District. 5. Having considered the same, this Court is of the opinion that there is no violation of the Court’s order. 6. Accordingly, this Contempt Case is closed. No order as to costs. 7. Interlocutory Applications, if any, stand closed in terms of this order. ______________________________________ GANNAMANENIRAMAKRISHNA PRASAD, J Dt: 13.11.2025 DSV 4 218 HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1642/2017 13.11.2025 DSV 5 HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATHI MAIN CASE No. CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1642/2017 PROCEEDING SHEET Sl. No DATE ORDER Office Note 7. 13.11.2025 GRKP, J Contempt Case is closed. (vide separate order) ___________ GRKP, J DSV 6