Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 5844 (UTT)

JAGDISH PRASAD BABLA v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPCRL/397/2025 · 2025-05-06

Pankaj Purohit

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS WPCRL No.397 of 2025 Hon’ble Pankaj Purohit, J. Mr. Suryakant Maithani, learned counsel for the petitioner. 2. Mr. B.C. Joshi, learned AGA for the State. 3. Mr. Aditya Singh, learned counsel has put in appearance on behalf of complainant. 4. An impleadment application (IA No.2/2025) has been moved by the petitioner for impleading the complainant/informant as respondent no.3 to the memo of the parties. 5. Since the impleadment sought for by the petitioner is formal in nature, therefore, the same is allowed. 6. Let necessary impleadment be incorporated by supplying amended memo of parties during the course of the day. 7. Learned State counsel made a statement at bar that after investigation, charge-sheet has been filed against the petitioner on 17.03.2025. 8. In view of the statement made by learned State Counsel, the present writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. 9. It is open to the petitioner to challenge the charge-sheet in appropriate proceedings before the appropriate Forum. (Pankaj Purohit, J.) 06.05.2025 AK