APHC010222532022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] THURSDAY, THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 23729/2022 Between: BAIRARAVANAMMA, W/O LATE VENKATEWARULU, D/O. LATE POLAYYA, AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, OCC SEASONAL BUSINESS, R/O 1-1, B.C.COLONY, SANKILI, REGIDIAMUDALAVALASA MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH 532440 ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP.BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, GUNTUR DISTRICT, NELAPADU-522 202 (A.P.), 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT, SRIKAKULAM, ANDHRA PRADESH 532001 3. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PALAKONDA, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. 4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, REGIDI POLICE STATION, AMADALAVALASAMANDAL,SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. 5. MALLIPUDI LAKSHMI, W/O. LATE MALLIPUDISATYANARAYANA H.NO.1-185, MAIN STREET, SANKILI VILLAGE, REGIDIAMADALAVALASA MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. 6. MALLIPUDIRAMADEVI, S/O. LATE MALLIPUDISATYANARAYANA H.NO.1-185, MAIN STREET, SANKILI, REGIDIAMADALAVALASA MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. 7. MALLIPUDI ANANDA VARMA, S/O. LATE MALLIPUDISATYANARAYANA H.NO.1-185, MAIN STREET, SANKILI, REGIDIAMADALAVALASA MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT.RESPONDENTS ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. ANAND NAIDU MAMIDI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. CHINNALA PRAVEEN 2. GP FOR HOME 2 The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “.... a Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondents 2 to 4 herein, in not registering the crime against the respondent Nos. 5 to 7, on the complaint dated 31.01.2022, lodged by the petitioner herein, though the contents in complaint against the un-official respondent Nos. 5 to 7, attracts non-cognizable offence, as illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional discriminatory, in violative of Art.14 of the Constitution of India, contrary to the Criminal Procedure Code and in breach of the law laid down by the Hon'ble Apex Court in case of Lalitha Kumari Vs. State of U.P. reported in 2014 (2) SCC Page-1 and consequently direct the respondents 2 to 4 to take immediate action on the complaint dated 31.01.2022, lodged by the petitioner by registering a crime against the respondent Nos. 5 to 7 as per law.” 2. When the matter is taken up for hearing, Sri Mamidi Anand Naidu, learned counsel for the Petitioner would submit that, no further orders are required in this matter as the relief has become infructuous. 3. Sri V.Farooq, leaned Assistant Public Prosecutor for Home would submit that the Court may pass appropriate orders. 4. Considering the submissions made, the Writ Petition is dismissed as the relief has become infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:13.11.2025 Dinesh 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.23729 of 2022 Dt.13.11.2025 Dinesh