Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 58438 (PNJ)

AJAY v. MANTI KUMARI

FAO-M/10/2025 · 2025-05-19

Anil Kshetarpal, Vikas Suri

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

FAO-M-10 of 2025(O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH FAO-M-10 of 2025(O&M) Date of Order:19.05.2025 Ajay .Appellant Versus Manti Kumari ..Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS SURI Present: Mr. Ajay Vijarania, Advocate for the appellant. ANIL KSHETARPAL, JUDGE (Oral) 1. The husband of the respondent assails the correctness of the impugned order passed by the Family Court directing him to pay maintenance pendente lite @ Rs.22,000/- to his wife and daughter. 2. The appellant is drawing gross salary of more than Rs.60,000/-, whereas his net salary is Rs.58,000/-. Hence, the Court has assessed interim maintenance @ Rs.22,000/-. 3. The learned counsel representing the appellant submits that after deduction of payment of tax, the net salary comes to Rs.50,000/- . The wife and minor child in her custody have only been granted Rs.22,000/- per month which comes to Rs.11,000/- each. 4. Hence, no ground to interfere with the impugned order is made out. 5. Dismissed. NARESH KUMAR 2025.05.26 11:12 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document FAO-M-10 of 2025(O&M) -2- 6. All the pending miscellaneous applications, if any, are also disposed of. (ANIL KSHETARPAL) JUDGE (VIKAS SURI) JUDGE May 19, 2025 nt Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No NARESH KUMAR 2025.05.26 11:12 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document