2025:UHC:4565-DB IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI G. NARENDAR AND HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE ALOK MAHRA 05th June, 2025 WRIT PETITION CRIMINAL No. 390 OF 2025 Rashmi Bahl …Petitioner Versus State of Uttarakhand and Others …Respondents Presence:- Mr. Nishant Krishna Adhikari, learned counsel for the petitioner. Mr. J.S. Virk, learned Deputy Advocate General for the State. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- JUDGMENT: (per Hon’ble The Chief Justice Sri G. Narendar) Learned counsel for the petitioner had argued the matter for some time in the morning and after having pointed out that the remedy would lie elsewhere, in view of the proceedings pending before the competent court of law, learned counsel had sought time to secure instructions. 2. Matter is called in the post-lunch session. Learned counsel submits that he has been instructed to seek withdrawal of the petition. 3. Submission of learned counsel is placed on record. 1 2025:UHC:4565-DB 4. The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. 5. It is open for the petitioner to agitate his grievances before the appropriate forum. _______________ G. NARENDAR, C.J. _______________ ALOK MAHRA, J. Dt: 5th June, 2025 UJJWAL 2