1 2025:CGHC:54056 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 12569 of 2025 • Smt. Kranti Paikra, W/o Birshu Ram Paikra, Aged About 40 Years, Presently Working As Teacher, Posted At Government Middle School, Bada, Block Rajpur, District Balrampur-Ramanujganj (C.G.). ... Petitioner versus 1. State Of Chhattisgarh, Through Secretary, Department Of School Education, Govt. Of Chhattisgarh, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhavan, Naya Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.). 2. Divisional Commissioner, Surguja Division, Ambikapur (C.G.). 3. The Director, Directorate Of Public Instruction First Floor, Indravati Bhavan, Nawa Raipur, Atal Nagar, District Raipur (C.G.). 4. The Collector, District Balrampur-Ramanujganj (C.G.). 5. Chief Executive Officer, Jila Panchayat, Balrampur-Ramanujganj (C.G.). 6. Joint Director (Education) And Divisional Level Committee, Surguja Division, Ambikapur (C.G.). 7. District Education Officer And Secretary, District Rationalization Committee, District Balrampur-Ramanujganj (C.G.). 8. Block Education Officer Rajpur, District Balrampur-Ramanujganj (C.G.). 9. Headmaster, Government Naveen Secondary School Dumrakholi, Block Kusmi, District Balrampur-Ramanujganj (C.G.). ... Respondents (Cause title taken from Case Information System) For Petitioner : Mr. Shahid Ahmed Ansari, Advocate. For State/Respondents : Mr. Aditya Tiwari, P.L. DEEPTI JHA Digitally signed by DEEPTI JHA 2 Hon’ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas Order on Board 06/11/2025 1. This petition has been filed by the petitioner challenging the transfer order dated 23.09.2025 (Annexure-P/9) passed by the respondent No.6, whereby the representation filed by the petitioner has been rejected without considering the mandatory policy of spousal posting. 2. After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition with liberty to file appeal before the State Level Committee constituted by the State Government. 3. State counsel has no objection with regard to the prayer made by the counsel for the petitioner. 4. Prayer is allowed. 5. In view of above, this petition stands dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty as prayed for. Sd/- (Narendra Kumar Vyas) Judge