1 2025:CGHC:55767 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CONT No. 993 of 2024 1 - Nanak Singh Paraste (N.S. Paraste) S/o Late Shri Dukal Singh Paraste, Aged About 60 Years Posted And Working As Assistant Professor (Economics), Rajiv Gandhi Arts And Commerce College, Lormi, District- Mungeli, Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - Shri Prasanna R., IAS Secretary,, Department Of Higher Education, Government Of Chhattisgarh, Mantralay, Mahanadi Bhawan, Capital Complex, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur, District- Raipur (C.G.) 2 - Shri Janak Prasad Pathak, IAS, Commissioner Higher Education, Government Of Chhattisgarh, Indrawani Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Raipur, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh. ... Respondents For Applicant : Mr. Dhani Ram Patel, Advocate. Respondents : Mr. Amrito Das, Advocate. Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas Order on Board 17/11 /2025 1. Learned counsel for the applicant would submit that the respondents have not complied with the order passed by this Court on 24.04.2023 in WPS No. 5975/2022 wherein following order has been passed:- “11. The law having been settled in the case of similarly appointed persons by the Single Bench of Madhya Pradesh High Court, affirmed by the Division Bench in Writ Appeal and SLP having been dismissed by the Supreme Court, this Court is of the considered opinion that the petitioner is also entitled for similar relief. 12. In view of the above, the writ petition stands allowed. The State Government shall consider the case of the petitioner/emergency appointee for grant of Senior Pay Scale/ Selection Grade Pay Scale by treating the services rendered by him from the initial date of appointment as regular appointment for the purpose of conferring the benefit of Senior Pay Scale ARUN KUMAR DEWANGAN Digitally signed by ARUN KUMAR DEWANGAN Date: 2025.11.18 11:03:24 +0530 2 and Selection Grade Pay Scale.” 2. Learned counsel for the respondents would submit that they have already considered the case of the applicant vide order dated 10.02.2025 wherein they have recorded that since the orientation course has not been done by the applicant within stipulated time period, therefore, the benefit cannot be given to the applicant, as such they have complied with the order passed by this Court. 3. Since the order passed by this Court has been complied with, nothing is required to be adjudicated by this Court. 4. Accordingly, the instant contempt petition is disposed of. Sd/- (Narendra Kumar Vyas) Judge Arun