V.Venkateswara Rao, @ Srinivasa Rao, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh
WP/10927/2016 · 2025-10-30
Gannamaneni Ramakrishna Prasad
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 58406 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 58406 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
APHC010256582016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3328] FRIDAY,THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO: 10927/2016 Between:
1. V.VENKATESWARA RAO, @ SRINIVASA RAO,, S/O.VANGALA GANGA RAJU, R/O.THUVVACHALAKARAYUDU PALEM, LINGAPALEM MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY DISTRICT COLLECTOR, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT, ELURU.
2. REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER ELURU WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT, -
3. THE TAHASILDAR LINGAPALEM MANDAL WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT, -
4. THE DIVISIONAL ENGINEER A P TRANSCO ELURU WEST GODAVARI, DISTRICT.
5. THE ASSISTANT ENGINEER APEPDC LTD RANGAPURAM, -
6. CHALLAGULLA SATYANARAYANA S/O SUBBA RAO, UPA SARPANCH, THUVVACHALAKARAYUDU PALEM GRAM PANCHAYAT, THUVVACHALAKARAYUDU PALEM, LINGAPALEM MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT.
...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. M N NARASIMHA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S):
2
1. GP FOR REVENUE (AP) The Court made the following:
ORAL ORDER:
Sri V. Srinivasula Reddy, learned Counsel appearing on behalf of Sri M.N. Narasimha Reddy, learned Counsel for the Writ Petitioner, on instructions, submits that this Writ Petition has become infructuous.
2. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is disposed of as having become infructuous. No order as to costs.
3. Interlocutory Applications, if any, stand closed in terms of this order.
______________________________________ GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD, J
Dt:31.10.2025 Vns