Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 58404 (BOM)

ANITA KANTILAL PATIL AND ORS v. DATTU EKNATH SAPKALE AND ORS

CA/7472/2019 · 2025-10-17

Shri Shailesh P Brahme

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

15 CA 7472 19.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 15 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 7472 OF 2019 IN FAST/15511/2019 ANITA KANTILAL PATIL AND ORS VERSUS DATTU EKNATH SAPKALE AND ORS ... Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Bhokarikar Madhav M. ... CORAM : SHAILESH P. BRAHME, J. DATE : 17.10.2025 PER COURT : None appears for the respondents, though served. 2. The applicants seek to condone the delay of 76 days in preferring the appeal. The averments of the application are not controverted. There are no mala fides on the part of the applicants in preferring the appeal belatedly. It is desirable to condone the delay. 3. The Civil Application is allowed in terms of prayer clause ‘B’. 4. The applicants shall carryout the amendment within four weeks. ( SHAILESH P. BRAHME, J.) mkd/- 1/1 2025:BHC-AUG:29775