MD. MAKBUL HUSSAIN LASKAR AND 7 ORS v. NILUFAR YESMIN AND 2 ORS
I.A.(Civil)/257/2025 · 2025-02-16
Robin Phukan
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 5840 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 5840 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page No.# 1/4 GAHC010008632025
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/257/2025 MD. MAKBUL HUSSAIN LASKAR AND 7 ORS S/O LATE EKRAM ALI LASKAR, R/O VILL- LAKHIPUR ROAD, P.S.-SILCHAR, DIST- CACHAR, ASSAM 2: ARIF HUSSAIN LASKAR S/O LATE AKTAR HUSSAIN LASKAR R/O VILL- LAKHIPUR ROAD P.S.-SILCHAR DIST- CACHAR ASSAM 3: MARIAM SULTANA LASKAR D/O LATE AKTAR HUSSAIN LASKAR R/O VILL- LAKHIPUR ROAD P.S.-SILCHAR DIST- CACHAR ASSAM 4: NAZIRA BEGUM LASKAR D/O LATE AKTAR HUSSAIN LASKAR R/O VILL- LAKHIPUR ROAD P.S.-SILCHAR DIST- CACHAR ASSAM 5: NADIRA BEGUM LASKAR D/O LATE AKTAR HUSSAIN LASKAR R/O VILL- LAKHIPUR ROAD P.S.-SILCHAR DIST- CACHAR ASSAM 6: RUMANA SULTANA LASKAR D/O LATE AKTAR HUSSAIN LASKAR
Page No.# 2/4 R/O VILL- LAKHIPUR ROAD P.S.-SILCHAR DIST- CACHAR ASSAM 7: MD. AKMAL HUSSAIN LASKAR S/O LATE EKRAM ALI LASKAR R/O VILL- LAKHIPUR ROAD P.S.-SILCHAR DIST- CACHAR ASSAM 8: MD. MAHMOOD HUSSAIN LASKAR S/O LATE EKRAM ALI LASKAR R/O VILL- LAKHIPUR ROAD P.S.-SILCHAR DIST- CACHAR ASSA VERSUS NILUFAR YESMIN AND 2 ORS D/O LATE PEARUDDIN MAZUMDER, R/O VILL- LAKHIPUR ROAD, OPPOSITE OF BRAHMAPUTRA BOARD OFFICE, SILCHAR TOWN, DIST- CACHAR, ASSAM, PIN-788103 2:MD. IFTIKAR ALAM MAZUMDER S/O LATE PEARUDDIN MAZUMDER R/O VILL- LAKHIPUR ROAD OPPOSITE OF BRAHMAPUTRA BOARD OFFICE SILCHAR TOWN DIST- CACHAR ASSAM PIN-788103 3:MD. INTEQAB ALOM MAZUMDER S/O LATE PEARUDDIN MAZUMDER R/O VILL- LAKHIPUR ROAD OPPOSITE OF BRAHMAPUTRA BOARD OFFICE SILCHAR TOWN DIST- CACHAR ASSAM PIN-78810 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. S K GHOSH, MS F AHMED Advocate for the Respondent : ,
Page No.# 3/4
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ROBIN PHUKAN ORDER Date : 17.02.2025
Heard Mr. S.K. Ghosh, learned counsel for the applicants. 2. This interlocutory application is preferred by the applicants for correction of typographical error in the order dated 03.01.2025, passed by this Court in CRP No. 140/2024. 3. Mr. Ghosh, learned counsel applicants submits that due to some inadvertence, the number of the title appeal in paragraph Nos. 2, 4 and 8 was mentioned as 27/2023 in the CRP No. 140/2024, in the order dated 03.01.2025, but it ought to have been 27/2013, and therefore, Mr. Ghosh submits that necessary correction may be made in the order dated 03.01.2025. 4. Having heard the submission of Mr. Ghosh, learned counsel for the applicants, I have carefully gone through the application and the documents placed on record and also perused the order dated 03.01.2025. 5.
It appears that in paragraph Nos. 2, 4 and 8 of the order dated 03.01.2025, the number of the title appeal has been mentioned as 27/2023, and it ought to have been 27/2013. 6. Taking note of the submission of Mr. Ghosh, learned counsel for the applicants, and also considering the facts and circumstances on the record, this application stands allowed. 7. Henceforth, in the order dated 03.01.2025, in CRP No. 140/2024, in paragraph Nos. 2, 4 and 8, the number of the title appeal shall be read as
Page No.# 4/4 27/2013, instead of 27/2023. 8. In terms of above, this I.A. stands disposed of. 9. Mr. Ghosh, learned counsel for the applicants shall file amended petition of CRP No. 140/2024 within a period of one week from today. JUDGE Comparing Assistant