IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 993 WRIT PETITION NO.13847 OF 2025 RAVI BALAJI MADEWAD VERSUS THE UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS ... Mr. N.S. Shah, Advocate for petitioner Mr. R.D. Sanap, Advocate for respondent No.1 Mr. A.M. Phule, AGP for respondent Nos.2 and 3 Mr. A.P. Bhandari, Advocate for respondent No.4 ... CORAM : SMT. VIBHA KANKANWADI & HITEN S. VENEGAVKAR, JJ. DATE : 16th DECEMBER, 2025 ORDER : . Learned Advocate for petitioner places on record written instructions, wherein it is stated that after the filing of writ petition Caste Scrutiny Committee has taken the decision and, therefore, the petition has become infructuous and, therefore, he be permitted to withdraw the petition. The copy of said letter is taken on record by marking Exh. ‘X’. In view of letter Exh. ‘X’ the writ petition stands dismissed as withdrawn. ( HITEN S. VENEGAVKAR, J. ) ( SMT. VIBHA KANKANWADI, J. ) agd 2025:BHC-AUG:35617-DB