B.BALAKRISHNA CHITTOOR DIST v. Transmission Corporation of Andhra Pradesh Ltd.,
WP/8384/2016 · 2025-10-30
Gannamaneni Ramakrishna Prasad
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 58396 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 58396 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010671352016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3328] FRIDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD
WRIT PETITION NO: 8384 OF 2016 Between:
1.
2.
B.BALAKRISHNA, S/O. B. VENKATAPPA, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS, R/O. D.NO.3-239-A4, RAJAJI STREET, MADANAPALLE, CHITTOOR DISTRICT.
B.KRISHNAIAH, S/O. B. PENCHALAIAH, AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS, R/O. D.NO.16-33/1, SUBASH ROAD, MADANAPALLE, CHITTOOR DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER AND
1. TRANSMISSION CORPORATION OF ANDHRA PRADESH LTD., VIDYUT SOUDHA, HYDERABAD, REP BY ITS CHAIRMAN & MANAGING DIRECTOR.
2. THE CHEIF ENGINEER, TRANSMISSION CORPORATION OF ANDHRA PRADESH LTD, KADAPA ZONE, KADAPA, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT.
3. THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER, OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE, TRANSMISSION CORPORATION OF ANDHRA PRADESH LTD, CHITTOOR, CHITTOOR DISTRICT.
4. THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER, OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE, TRANSMISSION CORPORATION OF ANDHRA PRADESH LTD, TIRUPATHI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT.
...RESPONDENT(S):
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. O MANOHER REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. V V SATISH (SC for APEPDCL)
2. SRI TALLAPRAGADA SRIRAM, LEARNED JUNIOR STANDING COUNSEL FOR TRANSCO The Court made the following:
ORAL ORDER:
None appeared for the Writ Petitioners.
2. Sri Tallapragada Sriram, learned Junior Standing Counsel for Standing Counsel for TRANSCO, is present.
3. The present Writ Petition is filed challenging the Tender Notification dated
03.03.2016.
4. Sri Tallapragada Sriram, learned Junior Standing Counsel for Standing Counsel for TRANSCO, on Instructions, submits that this Writ Petition has become Infructuous inasmuch as the Tender Notification has long expired.
5. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of as having become infructuous. No order as to costs.
6. Interlocutory Applications, if any, stand closed in terms of this order.
_________________________________ GANNAMANENIRAMAKRISHNA PRASAD, J Dt: 31.10.2025 DSV
162
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD
WRIT PETITION NO: 8384 OF 2016
31.10.2025
DSV
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATHI MAIN CASE No. WRIT PETITION NO: 8384 OF 2016 PROCEEDING SHEET
Sl. No
DATE ORDER Office Note
31.10.2025 GRKP, J
Writ Petition is disposed of as Infructuous. (vide separate order)
___________
GRKP, J DSV