Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 5782 of 2025 1 - Ramshankar Yadav S/o Late Mahavir Aged About 36 Years 2 - Sangita Yadav W/o Ramashankar Yadav Aged About 33 Years Both are R/o. Ward No.13, Ramanujganj, P.S. And Tahsil Ramanujganj, District- Balrampur-Ramanujganj (C.G.)
--- Petitioners versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through- The Secretary, Department Of Revenue, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, Atal Nagar, P.O. And P.S. Naya Raipur District- Raipur (C.G.) 2 - Collector Balrampur, District- Balrampur-Ramanujganj (C.G.) 3 - Tahsildar Ramanujganj District- Balrampur- Ramanujganj (C.G.) 4 - Alok Gupta S/o Late Nandlal Gupta Aged About 45 Years 5 - Arvind Gupta S/o Late Nandlal Gupta Aged About 40 Years 6 - Shravan Prajpati S/o Sitaram Prajapati Aged About 52 Years No.4 to 6 all are R/o Nagar, Ramanujganj, Police Station And Tahsil Ramanujganj, District- Balrampur,ramanujganj (C.G.)
--- Respondents ____________________________________________________________ For Petitioners : Mr. V.K. Pandey, Advocate For State/Respondents : Mr. Shreyansh Mehta, P.L. Hon'ble Shri Justice
Parth Prateem Sahu
Order On Board 06/11/2025
1. Petitioner has filed this petition seeking following relief (s) :-
“10.1 Issue notices to the respondents returnable within early date of hearing. BALRAM PRASAD DEWANGAN Digitally signed by BALRAM PRASAD DEWANGAN Date: 2025.11.07 16:22:27 +0530
2 10.2 direct the respondent No.3 to decide the application filed by petitioners under Section 131 of the Code, 1959 vide its case No.20251027/300029/2024-25 parties being “Ramshankar Yadav and another Vs. Alok Gupta and others”. 10.3 Grant any other relief (s)/ order (s)/ direction (s) in favour of petitioners, which deemed fit and proper in the
facts and circumstances of the case, in the interest of justice. 10.4 Cost of the petition.”
2.
Learned counsel for State-respondents submits that as per his instruction, the next date fixed by Tahsildar is on 12.11.2025 and submits that the proceedings may be completed within further period of two months.
3. Considering the nature of grievance as raised as also the submission of learned counsel for petitioner, writ petition at this stage is disposed of directing respondent No.3 to take decision on the pending proceedings on an application filed under Section 131 of Chhattisgarh Land Revenue Code, 1959 submitted by petitioners, in accordance with law expeditiously preferably within further period of two months from the date of receipt of this order. It is ordered accordingly.
4. With the aforesaid observations and directions, this petition stands
disposed of. Sd/- (Parth Prateem Sahu) Judge Balram