Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 58392 (AP)

M/s Ananda Constructions, v. Sri Anil Kumar Singhal,

CC/2869/2024 · 2025-10-30

Subba Reddy Satti

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010282232024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3331] FRIDAY,THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2869/2024 Between: 1. M/S ANANDA CONSTRUCTIONS,, REP. BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER A.SIRISH KUMAR S/O LATE ANANDA REDDY, AGE 48 YEARS, OCC- CONTRACTOR, R/O VARADARAJULAPALLE VILLAGE, MAPAKSHI POST, CHITTOOR MANDAL AND DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. SRI ANIL KUMAR SINGHAL, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT, STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI. 2. SRI BHASKAR KATAMANENI, DIRECTOR, MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION, STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, GUNTUR. 3. SRI SUMITH KUMAR, DISTRICT COLLECTOR(MUNCIPAL CORPN. WING), CHITTOOR DISTRICT AT CHITTOOR. 4. DR J ARUNA, , COMMISSIONER, CHITTOOR MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, CHITTOOR, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 5. T V GOMATHA, EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, CHITTOOR, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 6. SRI VADAREVU VINAY CHAND, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, FINANCE AND PLANNING, STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI. Page 2 of 4 7. PEEYUSH KUMAR, THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT FINANCE AND PLANNING DEPARTMENT R 7 IMPLEADED AS PER COURT ORDER DATED 30/08/24 IN CC NO- 2869 OF 2024 ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to ay be pleased to punish the respondents for their willful and deliberate disobedience of the orders passed by this Honble court in WP.No.35 of 2024 dated 20-03-2024 and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to dispense with the filing of certified copy of order in WP.No. 35 of 2024, dated 20-03-2024, to meet the ends of justice. Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. K V L NARASIMHA RAO Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. NAGARAJU NAGURU 2. NAGARAJU PULLAGURA 3. SUSHMA YAGANTI 4. KALAVA SURESH KUMAR REDDY ( SC FOR MC RAYAL REGION, NELLORE) 5. J DILEEP KUMAR The Court made the following: :: ORDER :: The above contempt case is filed complaining about the non- implementation of the order dated 20.03.2024 passed in W.P.No.35 of 2024. Page 3 of 4 2. Today, when the matter is taken up for consideration, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned counsel appearing for respondents would submit that the order dated 20.03.2024 passed in W.P.No.35 of 2024 has been complied with and no further adjudication is required in the contempt case. The same is recorded. 3. Recording the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the Contempt Case is closed. No order as to costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________________ JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI Date: 31.10.2025 TVN 259 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI CONTEMPT CASE No.2869 OF 2024 Date: 31.10.2025 TVN