APHC010051882011 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3524] WEDNESDAY,THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM FIRST APPEAL NO: 276/2011 Between: 1. RELIANCE INDUSTRIES LIMITED, A COMPANY REGISTERED UNDER THE COMPANIES ACT., REP., BY MR. VENKATA SIVARAMAN, VICE -PRESIDENT, III FLOOR, MAKER CHAMBER IV, 222, NARIMAN POINT MUMBAI - 400 021. ...APPELLANT AND 1. ADUSUMILLI SUSEELA DEVI, W/O. LATE ANJANEYULU HOUSEWIFE R/O. VIJAYAWADA, (REP., BY HER POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER, DR. C.N. RAO, RETD., PRINCIPAL CHIEF CONSERVATOR,FORESTS) 9-10-3, GIDDY LANE, GANDHI NAGAR, 2. ADUSUMILLI KRISHNA KISHORE, S/O. LATE ANJANEYULU EMPLOYEE R/O. MILWAKNEE, WISCONSIN, USA. ( REP., BY POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER DR C.N.RAO, RETIRED PRINCIPAL CHIEF CONSERVATOR,FORESTS, 9-10-3, GIDDY LANE, 3. ADUSUMILLI PRAMANA, W/O. KRISHNA KISHORE HOUSEWIFE R/O. MILWAKNEE, WISCONSIN, USA. ( REP., BY POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER DR C.N.RAO, RETIRED PRINCIPAL CHIEF CONSERVATOR,FORESTS, 9-10-3, GIDDY LANE, 4. ADUSUMILLI ARIANNA TEJ, D/O. KRISHNA KISHORE MINOR REP., BY FATHER I.E., MR.ADUSUMILLI 2 KRISHNA KISHORE) R/O. MILWAKNEE, WISCONSIN, USA. ( REP., BY POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER DR C.N.RAO, RETIRED PRINCIPAL CHIEF CONSERVATOR,FORESTS, 9-10-3, GIDDY LANE, 5. PENUMATSA VISWANADHA RAJU, S/O. LAKSHMIPATHI RAJU CULTIVATION, R/O. RANGANAYAKAPURAM, TALLAREVU MANDAL, KDMC., 6. PENUMATSA ANANDA GOPALAKRISHNAMRAJU, S/O. VISWANADHA RAJU CULTIVATION, R/O. RANGANAYAKAPURA, TALLAREVU MANDAL, KDMC., 7. PENUMATSA VENKATA LAXMIPATHI RAJU, S/O. VISWANADHA RAJU CULTIVATION, R/O. RANGANAYAKAPURAM, TALLAREVU MANDAL, 8. PENUMATSA VENKATA SURYANARAYANARAJU, S/O. VISWANADHA RAJU CULTIVATION, R/O. RANGANAYAKAPURAM TALLAREVU MANDAL. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Appellant: 1. P HEMACHANDRA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. B NALIN KUMAR 2. N V ANANTHA KRISHNA The Court made the following: JUDGMENT: (per Hon’ble Sri Justice Ravi Nath Tilhari) On 26.03.2025, the following order was passed: “ Request has been made on behalf of the appellant’s counsel for adjournment, to prepare the paper book. 2. List after two weeks in the Weekly Cause List. 3 3. No further adjournment will be granted as the matter pertains to the year 2011.” 2. Sri N.Manikanta, learned counsel appearing for the appellant’s counsel, prays for adjournment to advance arguments. 3. Sri G.Satya Naidu, learned counsel appears for the respondents. 4. We do not find any reason to adjourn the matter as no plausible reason is assigned and particularly, when on 26.03.2025, the order was passed that no further adjournment will be granted as the matter pertains to the year 2011. 5. The Appeal Suit is dismissed for want of prosecution. No order as to costs. 6. As a sequel thereto, interlocutory applications, if any pending, shall also stand closed. _____________________ RAVI NATH TILHARI, J ______________________________ MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM, J Pab