Dariboina Venkata Lakshumma @ Venkata Lakshmi v. THE STATE OF AP
WP/7129/2019 · 2025-10-27
B V L N Chakravarthi
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 58380 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 58380 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010148392019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3368] TUESDAY, THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI
WRIT PETITION NO: 7129/2019
Between:
1. DARIBOINA VENKATA LAKSHUMMA @ VENKATA LAKSHMI,, W/O VENKATESWARLU, AGED ABOUT 36YRS, RIO UPPALURU VILLAGE, NARASPURAM POST, KASINAYANA MANDAL, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER AND
1. THE STATE OF AP, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI AT AMARAVATI.
2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, , KADAPA, YSR DISTRICT.
3. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, , MYDUKUR,YSR DISTRICT
4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, B.KODUR, YSR DISTRICT.
5. THE SUBINSPECTOR OF POLICE, B.KODUR, YSR DISTRICT.
...RESPONDENT(S):
2 Counsel for the Petitioner:
1.
D PURNACHANDRA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1.
GP FOR HOME (AP) The Court made the following:
3
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N.CHAKRAVARTHI
WRIT PETITION No.7129 OF 2019
ORDER:
This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the following relief:
“….to issue writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus by declaring the action of respondents No.3 to 5 in not conducting investigation in Crime No.80/2017 of B. Kodur Police Station, YSR Kadapa District as illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional and consequently direct the respondents No.3 to take appropriate action against the accused in Crime No.80/2017 of B. Kodur Police Station, YSR Kadapa District and pass……”
2. Sri B.Madhukar,
learned counsel representing Sri D.Purnachandra Reddy, learned counsel for the writ petitioner would submit that the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive for further adjudication, and the Writ Petition has become infructuous.
3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home is in attendance.
4. Recording the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel thereto, interlocutory applications, if any, pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed.
______________________________ JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI 28.10.2025 Pmk
4
32 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI
WRIT PETITION No:7129 OF 2019
Date: 28.10.2025
Pmk