Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 5838 (JHR)

MD SHAMIM v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

Cr.M.P./578/2023 · 2025-08-20

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:JHHC:24507] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr.M.P. No.578 of 2023 ------ 1. Md. Shamim, aged about 62 years, Son of Late Iltaf Hussain, Resident of Birbal Gali, Rayan Mohalla, Post Office- Hindpiri, Police Station- Hindpiri, District- Ranchi, Jharkhand. 2. Md. Muslim, aged about 54 years, Late Iltaf Hussain, Resident of Birbal Gali, Rayan Mohalla, Post Office- Hindpiri, Police Station- Hindpiri, District- Ranchi, Jharkhand. … Petitioners Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Mira Devi, Wife of Raghuwansh Ojha, Resident of- Nawasoso, Ratu, Post Office- Ratu, Police Station- Ratu, District- Ranchi, Jharkhand. 3. Nidhi Kumari, Daughter of Raghuwansh Ojha, Resident of- Nawasoso, Ratu, Post Office- Ratu, Police Station- Ratu, District- Ranchi, Jharkhand. 4. Pratima Devi, Wife of Murli Kumar Sharma, Resident of- Nawasoso, Ratu, Post Office- Ratu, Police Station- Ratu, District- Ranchi, Jharkhand. 5. Bachi Devi, Wife of Vyas Ji Prasad, Resident of- Nawasoso, Ratu, Post Office- Ratu, Police Station- Ratu, District- Ranchi, Jharkhand. 6. Lalji Prasad, Son of Late Baldev Prasad, Resident of- Nawasoso, Ratu, Post Office- Ratu, Police Station- Ratu, District- Ranchi, Jharkhand. 7. Virendra Singh, Son of Ram Lakhan Singh, Resident of- Nawasoso, Ratu, Post Office- Ratu, Police Station- Ratu, District- Ranchi, Jharkhand. 8. Sachidanand Ram, Son of Ram Narayan Ram, Resident of- Nawasoso, Ratu, Post Office- Ratu, Police Station- Ratu, District- Ranchi, Jharkhand. … Opposite Parties ------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioners : Mr. Sanjay Kumar Tiwari, Advocate For the State : Mrs. Vandana Bharti, Addl.P.P. ------ Order No:-02 Dated:-20-08-2025 Heard the parties. Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission of this court to withdraw this Criminal Miscellaneous Petition with liberty to file an appropriate application. Permission is accorded. Accordingly, this Criminal Miscellaneous Petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. The certified copy of the documents, if any, may be substituted with their photocopy. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Saroj/