1 2025:CGHC:54035-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 5745 of 2025 Smt. Rashmi Agrawal W/o Rajesh Kumar Agrawal Aged About 39 Years R/o House No. B-87, Amrapali, Vananchal City, Bhilai, P.S. Jamul, Tehsil Durg, District Durg Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner versus 1 - State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department of Revenue And Disaster Management, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh 2 - The Commissioner Nagar Palik Nigam, Bhilai, District Durg, Chhattisgarh ... Respondents _________________________________________________________ For Petitioner : Mr. Vidya Bhushan Soni, Advocate For State / Respondent No.1: Mr. S.S. Baghel, Dy. Govt. Advocate For Respondent No.2 : Mr. Amrito Das, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Bibhu Datta Guru , Judge Order on Board Per Ramesh Sinha, C.J. 06 . 11 .202 5 1. Heard Mr. Vidya Bhushan Soni, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. S.S. Baghel, learned Dy. Government Advocate, appearing for the State/respondent No.1 and Mr. Amrito Das, learned counsel, appearing for respondent No.2. ROHIT KUMAR CHANDRA Digitally signed by ROHIT KUMAR CHANDRA 2 2. The present petition under Section Article 226 of the Constitution has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayers : 10.1. That this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction, quashing the impugned letter dated 28/07/2025 (Annexure P/6), passed by the Respondent No. 2 as being without jurisdiction, illegal, arbitrary, in violation of principles of natural justice. 10.2 That this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order, or direction commanding the respondents to restore the tender process to the stage obtaining immediately prior to the impugned cancellation dated 28/07/2025 and to allot the plot no. 13 in Block No. 5A to the petitioner. 10.3 That any other relief which this Hon'ble Court deems fit and proper may also be granted in favor of the petitioner safeguarding their interest.” 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he wants to withdraw the instant petition. 4. Accordingly, the instant petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- Sd/- (Bibhu Datta Guru) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice Chandra