Page 1 of 2. IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK CRLMC No.3890 of 2025 Jaga@ Jagannatha Nayak @ Jagannath ..... Petitioner Represented By Adv. - Kuldeep Mohanty -versus- State Of Odisha ..... Opposite Party Represented By Adv. – Ms. S.Nayak, A.S.C. CORAM: THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ADITYA KUMAR MOHAPATRA Order No. ORDER 24.09.2025 01. 1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid mode. 2. Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner. 3. The Petitioner is aggrieved by the order dated 13.07.2022 on which date the NBW of arrest has been issued against him by the learned 2nd Additional District Judge, Rourkela in S.T. Case No.88 of 2019. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that initially the petitioner was on bail. He further submits that since the date of his release on bail the petitioner was appearing before the Court in seisin over the matter. However, on the date fixed for appearance before the Court in seisin over the matter, due to communication gap with his lawyer, the petitioner was unable to appear since no step was taken to represent the petitioner by the counsel appearing for him. Therefore, a non-bailable warrant of arrest was issued Page 2 of 2. against the petitioner. It was further contended that for the laches on the part of the counsel, the party should not be allowed to suffer. Therefore, being aggrieved by order dated 13.07.2022, the petitioner has approached this Court with a prayer to quash the same. 5. On perusal of the record, this Court is of the view that the trial court has not committed any illegality, however, in the larger interests of justice and in order to provide another opportunity to the Petitioner, this Court deems it proper to set aside the order dated 13.07.2022 passed by the learned 2nd Additional District Judge, Rourkela in S.T. Case No.88 of 2019, subject to payment of cost of Rs.2,000/- (Rupees Two Thousand) by the Petitioner to the Advocates' Welfare Fund of Local Bar Association within fifteen days and furnishing money receipt thereof as proof of deposit. Further, it is directed that the Petitioner shall appear before the learned 2nd Additional District Judge, Rourkela within two weeks from today along with a copy of this order and he shall appear before the learned trial court on each and every date, unless his appearance is specifically dispensed with by the learned trial court. In the event, the Petitioner makes any further default in appearance, it is open to the Court in seisin over the matter to take necessary coercive steps against the Petitioner. 6. The CRLMC is accordingly, disposed of. ( A.K. Mohapatra ) Judge Rubi