1 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WP227 No. 1122 of 2025 1 - Dr. Smt. Meenal Jain W/o Shri Vijay Jain Aged About 30 Years R/o Vip Colony, Sarkanda, Bilaspur, Tahsil And District - Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - Vijay Pillay S/o Late Sudhir Nath Pillay Aged About 67 Years R/o Rajendra Nagar Chowk, Bilaspur, Tahsil And District - Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 2 - Divyaraj Pillay S/o Late Vinod Pillay Aged About 28 Years R/o Geetanjali Vihar, Ward No. 3, Bilaspur, Tahsil And District - Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 3 - Shourya Raj Pillay S/o Late Vinod Pillay Aged About 26 Years R/o Geetanjali Vihar, Ward No. 3, Bilaspur, Tahsil And District - Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 4 - Smt Shashi Pillai W/o Late Vinod Pillay Aged About 58 Years R/o Geetanjali Vihar, Ward No. 3, Bilaspur, Tahsil And District - Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 5 - Rajendra S/o Late Sudhir Nath Pillay Aged About 63 Years R/o 2-A, Bsp, Road No. - 26, Sector - 5, Civic Center, Bhilai, Tahsil - Bhilai, District - Durg, Chhattisgarh 6 - Sanjay Pillay S/o Late Sudhir Nath Pillay Aged About 62 Years R/o Rajendra Nagar Chowk, Bilaspur, Tahsil And District - Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 7 - Ankit S/o Late Vinay Pillay Aged About 27 Years R/o House No. 96, Rajendra Nagar Chowk, Bilaspur, Tahsil And District - Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 8 - Amit S/o Late Vinay Pillay Aged About 24 Years R/o House No. 96, Rajendra Nagar Chowk, Bilaspur, Tahsil And District - Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 9 - Nitani Pillay W/o Late Vinay Pillay Aged About 54 Years R/o House No. 96, Rajendra Nagar Chowk, Bilaspur, Tahsil And District - Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 10 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The District Magistrate, Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) PAWAN KUMAR Digitally signed by PAWAN KUMAR Date: 2025.11.06 15:40:11 +0530 2 For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Manish Nigam, Advocate For State : Mr. T. L. Bareth, PL Hon’ble Shri Justice Sachin Singh Rajput Order on Board 06/11/2025 After arguing for sometime, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the suit is pending since 2023 more than two years has been passed therefore, a direction may be issued to the trial Court to conclude the suit within a reasonable period of time. 2. In view of the aforesaid submission, this Court is not inclined to issue a mandatory direction to the trial Court to conclude the suit within a fixed time frame. However, considering the nature of dispute, it is expected that the trial Court shall make an earnest endeavour to expedite the trial and conclude the proceedings at the earliest possible. 3. With the above observations, the writ petition stands disposed of. Sd/- (Sachin Singh Rajput) JUDGE Pawan