1 2025:CGHC:54498 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MCRC No. 7925 of 2025 1 - Rahul Singh Rajput @ Rahul Thakur S/o Dharmendra Singh Rajput Aged About 21 Years R/o Ramnagar Ward No.02, Kawardha Police Station Kawardha, District- Kabirdham (C.G.) ... Applicant(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through- Station House Officer, Police Station Mahila Thana, Kawardha, District- Kabirdham (C.G.) ... Respondent(s) For Applicant(s) : Shri Dharmesh Shrivastava, Advocate For Respondent/State : Ms. Nupur Trivedi, PL (Hon’ble Shri Justice Arvind Kumar Verma) Order on Board 07/11/2025 The applicant has filed this bail application under Section 483 of the Bhartiya Nagrrik Suraksha Sanhita for grant of regular bail as he is in custody in connection with Crime No. 18/2025 registered at police station Mahila Thana, Kawardha, District Kabirdham (CG) for the 2 offence punishable under Sections 65(1) and 64(2)(m) of BNS, Section 376(3) IPC and Section 6 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012. 2. Prosecution case in brief is that mother of the victim lodged a report on 03.04.2025 at police station Mahila Thana, Kawardha, District Kabirdham alleging inter alia that on 14.11.2024, she came to know that her minor daughter had gone out from school with some one. Upon enquiry, victim disclosed that she knew the applicant since the year 2023 through instagram. It is alleged that thereafter the applicant and the prosecutrix established physical relations as they were having love affair. On the basis of the written report, the applicant was arested. 3. Counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the case. He submits that there was love affair between the applicant and the prosecutrix. He further submits that the applicant is in jail since 04.04.2025, the charge sheet has been filed and the trial is likely to take some time, he is ready and willing to comply with any of the conditions which may be imposed upon him and thus, it is submitted that the application be allowed and the applicant be released on bail. 4. Learned counsel for the respondent/State opposed the bail application. 5. Victim and her mother appeared through the concerned DLSA and have raised objection. 3 6. Heard counsel for the parties and perused the record. 7. On due consideration of the rival submissions and the fact that the applicant and the prosecutrix were having love affair and further that the applicant is in jail since 04.04.2025, the charge sheet has been filed and looking to the fact that the final disposal of the trial is likely to take sufficiently long time, the present application deserves to be allowed. Accordingly, his bail application is allowed. 8. It is directed that in the event of applicant executing a personal bond for a sum of Rs. 10,000/- with one surety to the satisfaction of the concerned trial court, he shall be released on bail on the following conditions: i) He/she shall appear before the trial court regularly on each and every date, unless exempted from appearance. ii) He/she shall not make any attempt to tamper with the prosecution witnesses. Iii) the applicant is directed not to communicate/contact in any manner with the prosecutrix, her family members and the witnesses cited in the charge sheet any other person concerned or attempt to ask for any favour in the trial directly or indirectly. Sd/- (Arvind Kumar Verma) Judge SUGUNA DUBEY Digitally signed by SUGUNA DUBEY Date: 2025.11.10 18:30:15 +0530