Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 58342 (PNJ)

SUDESH SALARIA v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

CWP/15992/2022 · 2025-04-03

Aman Chaudhary

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT 241-1 Sudesh Salaria State of Punjab and others CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY Present: Mr. Mr. Satnam Preet Singh, DAG, Punjab *** AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (Oral) 1. Prayer made in the present petition for directing the respondents to decide the representation dated 25.07.2021 petitioner. 2. Learned counsel submits that father of the petitioner Naresh Salaria, and it was declared the age of 20 years. 3. The the Policy/Instructions P8) and his case was recommended vide letter dated 28.09 however, having during pendency whereof IV post, he submit with the written statement filed by respondent Nos.1 been taken thereon Punjab and others, involving the the petitioner for submits that since IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-15992 Date of decision: Sudesh Salaria Versus Punjab and others HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY Mr. Onkar Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Satnam Preet Singh, DAG, Punjab *** AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (Oral) Prayer made in the present petition for directing the respondents to decide the representation dated 25.07.2021 and Learned counsel submits that father of the petitioner Naresh Salaria, was killed during an encounter was declared a battle casualty (Annexure the age of 20 years. The claim was made for appointment of the petitioner in terms of the Policy/Instructions of Appointments of Honour and Gratitude ( his case was recommended vide letter dated 28.09 however, having been not appointed, he approached this Court during pendency whereof, in pursuant to asking he submitted an application dated 14.10.2022 with the written statement filed by respondent Nos.1 thereon. He refers to Captain and others, CWP-19503-2008, which daughter of the said employee who the petitioner for Class-II post, was offered Class since his representation is pending, IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 15992-2022 (O&M) Date of decision: 03.04.2025 ..Petitioner ..Respondents HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY , Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Satnam Preet Singh, DAG, Punjab. Prayer made in the present petition for directing the respondents to and give Class-III post to son of the Learned counsel submits that father of the petitioner i.e. late Sh. encounter with the terrorists on 03.07.2004 (Annexure P1) having sacrificed his life at for appointment of the petitioner in terms of Appointments of Honour and Gratitude (Annexure his case was recommended vide letter dated 28.09.2007 (Annexure P4 he approached this Court on 11.07.2022, to asking of submitting a letter for Class an application dated 14.10.2022 (Annexure R1) appended with the written statement filed by respondent Nos.1 & 3 but still no action has Captain Janmej Singh vs. State which was allowed on 06.10.2010 employee who was recommended along with Class-I post. He, on instructions pending, a direction may be given Prayer made in the present petition for directing the respondents to post to son of the late Sh. .2004 having sacrificed his life at for appointment of the petitioner in terms of Annexure Annexure P4), .2022, ass- appended but still no action has State of 06.10.2010 was recommended along with instructions, ASHOK KUMAR 2025.04.04 12:21 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-15992-2022 (O&M) -2- to decide the same in a time bound manner keeping in view the aforesaid judgment. 4. In view of the above and without commenting on the merits of the case, this petition is hereby disposed of with a direction to the respondents to decide the representation dated 25.07.2021, within a period of 4 months, taking note of the aforesaid submissions and judgment, which this Court has no reason to believe the authorities would not address in a just, fair and reasonable manner. Upon doing so, after notice and hearing offered to her and if found entitled, grant the benefit forthwith. Needless to say, if the orders are adverse to her interest, the same shall contain reasons and the petitioner shall be free to seek legal redress thereupon. ( AMAN CHAUDHARY ) 03.04.2025 JUDGE ashok Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No ASHOK KUMAR 2025.04.04 12:21 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document