CRM-M-26683 of 2025 (O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-26683 of 2025 (O&M) DATE OF DECISION: 10th July, 2025 Teerath Ram @ Tirath Ram and another .....PETITIONERS VERSUS State of Punjab .....RESPONDENT CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUMEET GOEL Present: Ms. Swati Verma, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Durgesh Garg, AAG Punjab. *** SUMEET GOEL, J (ORAL) 1. Present petition has been filed under Section 483 BNSS, 2023 for grant of regular bail to the petitioner in case bearing FIR No.36 dated 22.03.2025 under Sections 326(G), 61(2), 303(2), 317(2) of BNS, 2023 and Section 3(A) of Explosive Substance Act, 1908, registered at Police Station City Batala, District Gurdaspur. 2. The case set up in the FIR in question (as set out by the petitioner in the present petition) is as follows:- “Head Munshi, Police Station City Batala, Today I ASI was present at the police station. SI Sukhjinder Singh, Station House Officer, Police Station City Batala, received a mobile phone instruction that someone's house in Kot Gali Hathi Gate Batala has suffered damage due to fire. Please reach the ASI Chowk Hathi Gate Batala. Where SI Sukhjinder Singh, Station House Officer of Police Station City Batala, along with his fellow officers and PCR officers ASI Ashwani Kumar 3121/Batala, ASI Roop Lal No.2705/Batala met, the PCR officers said that we were on duty last night and came to know from the people that today at around 3-00AM, a fire REEMA SAINI 2025.07.10 16:50 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court, Chandigarh CRM-M-26683 of 2025 (O&M) -2- broke out in the house of Bunty son of Subhas Kumar Bhatti, resident of Kot Gali Hathi Gate Batala, due to which a lot of damage has been done to the belongings, furniture, etc. in the house and the house has caught fire. However, with the help of five people, the fire was extinguished. I ASI reached the house of the Bunty and saw that the furniture, clothes, beds, AC, etc. Inverter and doors and others materials were burnt, which was informed to the FSL team and fingerprint team to come to the spot to find out the cause of the fire. After some time, FSL officer Mr. Ravi Sharma along with his team and fingerprint officer HC Shamser Singh No. 24 FPB, CT Mandeep Singh No.1692/Batala came. Who started their own action and the action of E-Saksa was implemented by the ASI. After taking his action, the FSL officer Mr. Ravi Sharma put three different parcels of ash taken with the evidence in plastic boxes and marked one plastic box with ash taken from the spot mark (1), one plastic box with ash taken from the spot mark (2. One plastic box with ash taken from the spot mark 3).The said three plastic boxes were handed over to me. That I ASI put my word stamp CS on the three parcels and took into possession of police. That no family member was present bin the house. That it is found from the circumstances that back door of the house was broken. That some unknown persons have put house on fire of bunty to cause danger to human life. If someone was present in house it could cause damage to human life and people around this house. That some unknown persons have committed offence under section 326(g) by putting house on fire. On which ruka is written and sent to police station.” 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners has argued that the petitioners are in custody since 01.04.2025. Learned counsel for the petitioners has further submitted that the petitioners are not named in the FIR amd their name has surfaced during investigation on the basis of a secret information. It is submitted that no recovery has been effected from the petitioners. Learned counsel has further submitted that similarly placed co-accused namely Rajan Bhatti and Kamla Bhatti @ Baggi have been extended the concession of regular bail by this Court vide order dated 4.7.2025 in CRM-M No.31327 of 2025 and 31361 of 2025 respectively. Learned counsel further submitted that the investigation in the present case is complete and no useful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioners behind bar any longer. REEMA SAINI 2025.07.10 16:50 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court, Chandigarh CRM-M-26683 of 2025 (O&M) -3- 4. Learned State counsel has opposed the present petition arguing that the allegations raised are serious in nature and thus the petitioner does not deserve the concession of the regular bail. 5. I have heard counsel for the parties and have gone through the available records of the case. 6. The petitioners were was arrested on 01.04.2025 whereinafter investigation was carried out & challan was presented on 20.06.2025. Total 16 prosecution witnesses have been cited but none has been examined till date. It is not in dispute that the similarly placed co-accused Rajan Bhatti and Kamla Bhatti have been extended the concession of regular bail by this Court vide order dated 4.7.2025. It is indubitable that the culmination of the trial, but of course, will take its own time. The contentions raised by rival parties give rise to debatable issues which shall be ratiocinated upon during the course of trial. This Court does not deem it appropriate to delve deep into these rival contentions, at this stage, lest it may prejudice the trial. Nothing tangible has been brought forward to indicate the likelihood of the petitioner absconding from the process of justice or interfering with the prosecution evidence. As per the custody certificate dated 08.07.2025 filed by the learned State counsel, the petitioner has suffered incarceration for 3 months and 5 days & is not shown to be involved in any other case. Suffice to say further detention of the petitioner as an undertrial is not warranted in the facts and circumstances of the present case. 7. In view of totality of factual matrix of the present case, the instant petition is allowed. Petitioners are ordered to be released on regular bail on their furnishing bail/surety bonds to the satisfaction of the Ld. concerned CJM/Duty Magistrate. However, in addition to conditions that REEMA SAINI 2025.07.10 16:50 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court, Chandigarh CRM-M-26683 of 2025 (O&M) -4- may be imposed by the concerned CJM/Duty Magistrate, the petitioners shall remain bound by the following conditions:- (i) The petitioners shall not mis-use the liberty granted. (ii) The petitioners shall not tamper with any evidence, oral or documentary, during the trial. (iii) The petitioners shall not absent himself on any date before the trial. (iv) The petitioners shall not commit any offence while on bail. (v) The petitioners shall deposit his passport, if any, with the trial Court. (vi) The petitioners shall give his cell phone number to the Investigating Officer/SHO of concerned Police Station and shall not change his cell-phone number without prior permission of the trial Court/Illaqa Magistrate. (vii) The petitioners shall not in any manner try to delay the trial. 8. In case of breach of any of the aforesaid conditions and those which may be imposed by concerned CJM/Duty Magistrate as directed hereinabove or upon showing any other sufficient cause, the State/complainant shall be at liberty to move cancellation of bail of the petitioner. 9. Ordered accordingly. 10. Nothing said hereinabove shall be construed as an expression of opinion on the merits of the case. (SUMEET GOEL) 10th July, 2025 JUDGE reema Whether speaking/reasoned Yes Whether reportable No REEMA SAINI 2025.07.10 16:50 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court, Chandigarh