Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 5834 (HP)

Dinesh v. Mohan Lal

RSA/117/2016 · 2025-08-05

Satyen Vaidya

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Dinesh vs. Mohan Lal RSA No.117 of 2016 and CO No.81 of 2016 05.08.2025 Present: None for appellants No.1, 3 to 7 Respondent No.4 is stated to have expired. Ms. Devyani Sharma, Senior Advocate with Mr.Anirudh Sharma, Advocate, for respondents No.5, 7 and 8/Cross-objectors. Respondent No.9 already ex-parte. RSA No.117 of 2016 There is no representation on behalf of appellants No.1, 3 to 7. Appellants No.2 and 8 are stated to have expired, but no steps have been taken for their further representation in the appeal. In such circumstances, the appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. Cross Objections No.81 of 2016 Learned counsel for the cross objectors seeks time to make submissions on the applications being CMP(M) No.1361, 1362, 1363, 18409, 1365, 1366 and 18410 of 2025. At her request, list on 26th August, 2025. ( Satyen Vaidya ) Judge August 05, 2025 (vt)