1 2025:CGHC:54299 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MCC No. 1129 of 2025 Sanjay Kumar Rathore (In Person) S/o Late Shri Jadbharat Rathore, Aged About 41 Years R/o Village Sonsari Thana Mulmula Tahsil Akaltara, District Janjgir Champa (C.G.) ... Petitioner versus 1 - Shri Avinash Champavat Revenue Department Mahanadi Bhawan Mantralaya Atal Nagar Nava Raipur District Raipur (C.G.) 2 - Shri Janmejay Mahobe, District Collector Janjgir Champa (C.G.) 3 - Shri Himanshu Gupta Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat Akaltara District Janjgir Champa (C.G.) 4 - Shri Vikrant Anchal Sub Divisional Officer (Ra.) Akaltara, District Janjgir Champa (C.G.) 5 - Shri Prashant Gupta Nayab Tahsildar Akaltara District Janjgir Champa (C.G.) 6 - Shri Sanat Kumar Sahu Sachiv Village Panchayat Sonsari Janpad Panchayat Akaltara, District Janjgir Champa (C.G.) 7 - Shri Umesh Kumar Sahu Sarpanch Village Panchayat Sonsari Janpad Panchayat Akaltara District Janjgir Champa (C.G.) 8 - Smt. Madhuri Rathore Purv Janpad Sadasy Janpad Panchayat Akaltara District Janjgir Champa (C.G.) ... Respondents For Petitioner : Mr. Sanjay Kumar Rathore, Petitioner in Person For Respondents : None Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas Order on Board BHUMIKA ANGARE Digitally signed by BHUMIKA ANGARE Date: 2025.11.11 10:48:58 +0530 2 07.11.2025 1. The petitioner has filed the this application for reviewing of the order dated 26.09.2025 passed by this Court in Cont Case No. 1490 of 2025. 2. This Court has taken into consideration the fact that the order has been complied with and the petitioner is unable to make out the case that the order has not been complied with which may be a ground for review of the order. 3. From the argument, it is quite vivid that the petitioner in person intends to argue that on the basis of wrong material the respondents have stated that the order has been complied with. As such this submission can not be a ground for review, infact it amounts to re-agitate the issue afresh which is not permissible at this stage. 4. In view of the above, the application for review of order is dismissed. However, liberty is given to the petitioner to challenge the order on the basis of which the respondents have stated that order has been complied with, before appropriate forum. Sd/- (Narendra Kumar Vyas) Judge Bhumika