APHC010510842021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY,THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 30652 OF 2021 Between: 1. Bodapati Rajeswaramma, W/o.Venkata Rao, aged about 70 years R/o.Kakatiyanagar, Nandigama, Krishna District. 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Through the Principal Secretary, Department of Home, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur District. 2. The Superintendent of Police, Krishna, Machilipatnam. 3. The Station House Officer, Nandigama, Krishna District. 4. Suryadevara Chalamaiah, S/o.Satyanarayana, aged about 52 years, Rythupeta, Nandigama, Krishna District. 5. Suryadevara Purnachandra Rao, S/o.Gopala Rao, aged about 56 years, Rythupeta, Nandigama, Krishna District. 6. Bandaru Srinivasa Rao, Satyanarayana, aged about 55 years, Rythupeta, Nandigama, Krishna District. Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY,THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA PETITION NO: 30652 OF 2021 1. Bodapati Rajeswaramma, W/o.Venkata Rao, aged about 70 years R/o.Kakatiyanagar, Nandigama, Krishna District. ...Petitioner AND 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Through the Principal Secretary, Department retariat, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur District. 2. The Superintendent of Police, Krishna, Machilipatnam. 3. The Station House Officer, Nandigama, Krishna District. 4. Suryadevara Chalamaiah, S/o.Satyanarayana, aged about 52 years, Krishna District. 5. Suryadevara Purnachandra Rao, S/o.Gopala Rao, aged about 56 years, Rythupeta, Nandigama, Krishna District. 6. Bandaru Srinivasa Rao, Satyanarayana, aged about 55 years, Rythupeta, Nandigama, Krishna District. ...Respondents under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH MONDAY,THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF OCTOBER THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA 1. Bodapati Rajeswaramma, W/o.Venkata Rao, aged about 70 years ...Petitioner 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Through the Principal Secretary, Department 4. Suryadevara Chalamaiah, S/o.Satyanarayana, aged about 52 years, 5. Suryadevara Purnachandra Rao, S/o.Gopala Rao, aged about 56 years, 6. Bandaru Srinivasa Rao, Satyanarayana, aged about 55 years, Rythupeta, ...Respondents under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of MANDAMUS declaring the in action of the Respondents in taking action on the Petitioner's complaint dt13-12-2021 as well as in FIR.91/2021 dt 09-02-2021 as arbitrary, illegal and violative of right to property under Article.21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents to take action on the Petitioner's complaint forthwith and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2021 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the Respondents No.1 to 3 to take action against the Respondents No. 4 to 6 on the complaint dt:13-12-2021 as well as in FIR No.91/2021, dt:09-02-2021 forthwith, pending disposal of the above writ petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: SAI GANGADHAR CHAMARTY Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME The Court made the following order: THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 30652 OF 2021 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “…pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of MANDAMUS declaring the in action of the Respondents in taking action on the Petitioner's complaint dt13-12-2021 as well as in FIR.91/2021 dt 09-02-2021 as arbitrary, illegal and violative of right to property under Article.21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents to take action on the Petitioner's complaint forthwith and pass....…” 2. Heard Sri Sai Gangadhar Chamarthy, learned Counsel for the petitioner and Sri V.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home for the respondents. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that police are not taking any action on the petitioner’s complaint dt13-12-2021 as well as in FIR.91/2021 dt 09-02-2021. 4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader on written instructions would submit that basing on the contents of the complaint, a case was registered against the unofficial respondent in Cr.No.91 of 2021, dated 09.02.2021 for the offence punishable under Section 329(4), 115(2) r/w 3(5) of BNS of Gampalagudem Police Station. 5. Recording the same, this writ petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATAJYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 27.10.2025 KKV HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.30652 of 2025 Dated: 27.10.2025 KKV