1 2025:CGHC:54367 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 3323 of 2025 Ranjit Nagvanshi S/o Mulchand Nagvanshi Aged About 32 Years R/o Parsuli, Police Station- Gurur, Civil And Rev. District Balod (C.G.) ... Petitioner versus State Of Chhattisgarh Through Station House OfÏcer, Police Station Gurur, Civil And Rev. District Balod (C.G.) ---- Respondent For Petitioner : Mr. Avinash Chand Sahu, Advocate. For Respondent/State : Ms. Ankita Shukla, Panel Lawyer. Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha , Chief Justice Order on Board 07.11.2025 1. This petition under Section 528 of the BNSS, has been filed by the petitioners for extension of time to deposit the fine amount of Rs. 10,000/- (each) as per order dated 27.09.2024 passed by this Court in CR.R. No.796/2013. 2. This Court, vide order dated 27.09.2024, while partly allowing the revision petition and sentencing the petitioners to the period already undergone, had directed the petitioners to deposit the fine amount of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. 5000/- each for offence under Sections 454 and 380 of IPC), in addition to what he had already deposited, and had granted two month’s RAJSHEKHAR SONI Digitally signed by RAJSHEKHAR SONI 2 time from the date of passing of the order for depositing the said fine amount. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submit that the direction issued by this Court regarding the payment of fine amount of Rs. 10,000/- could not be complied within stipulated time of two months. As the petitioner was not aware of the order dated 27.09.2024, due to which the petitioner got arrested on 25.05.2025. Hence, he prays that the time period for depositing the fine amount may be extended. 4. Learned counsel for the other side opposes the prayer and submits that in compliance of the Court’s order dated 27.09.2024, the petitioner was directed to deposit Rs. 10,000/- before the trial Court concerned, and he was given two month’s time which was sufÏcient for depositing the said amount, but the petitioner has not paid the amount, therefore, he was again arrested on 25.05.2025. Therefore, the instant petition is liable to be dismissed. 5. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the documents appended thereto. 6. Considering the submissions advanced by learned counsel for the parties, and from the perusal of the documents annexed with the instant petition, it transpires that in compliance of the Court’s order dated 27.09.2024, the petitioner was directed to deposit Rs. 10,000/- before the trial Court concerned, and he was given two month’s time which was sufÏcient for depositing the said amount, but the amount was not deposited, therefore, the petitioner was again arrested on 25.05.2025, and no any good ground has been raised by the counsel for the petitioner in the present case on merits, thus, this Court is of the opinion that there is no 3 good ground to extend the time granted to the petitioner by this Court for depositing the fine amount of Rs. 10,000/- in CRR No.796/2013 vide order dated 27.09.2024. 7. Accordingly, the instant Cr.M.P. stands dismissed. 8. Registry is directed to send a certified copy of this order to the trial Court concerned for necessary information and compliance forthwith. Sd/- (Ramesh Sinha) Chief Justice Rajshekhar