1 2025:CGHC:54680 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 5851 of 2025 Anoop Mishra S/o Shri M.P. Mishra Aged About 40 Years Working In Post Of Incharge Branch Manager Chhattisgarh State Warehousing Corporation Branch Takhatpur, Village- Lidri, R/o. Shastri Nagar Sarkanda, District- Bilaspur (C.G.) ... Petitioner versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Food, Civil Supplies And Consumer Protection, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur, District - Raipur (C.G.) 2 - Director Directorate Of Food, Civil Supplies And Consumer Protection, Block- 2, 3rd Floor Indrawati Bhawan, Nava Raipur, District- Raipur (C.G.) 3 - Chhattisgarh State Warehousing Corporation Through Its Chairman, Head Office, Sector 24 Atal Nagar, Nava Raipur, District- Raipur (C.G.) 4 - Managing Director Chhattisgarh State Warehousing Corporation, Head Office Sector, 24 Atal Nagar, Nava Raipur, District- Raipur, (C.G.) 5 - Manager Personal Chhattisgarh State Warehousing Corporation, Head Office Sector, 24 Atal Nagar, Nava Raipur, District- Raipur, (C.G.) 6 - Manager Accounts Chhattisgarh State Warehousing Corporation, Head Office Sector, 24 Atal Nagar, Nava Raipur, District- Raipur, (C.G.) 2 7 - Director Directorate Of Medical Education, Indrawati Bhawan, Nava Raipur, District- Raipur (C.G.) ... Respondents For Petitioner : Mr. Achyut Tiwari , Advocate For Respondent No. 1,2 & 7-State : Mr. Rishabh Bisen, Panel lawyer For Respondent no. 3 to 6 : Mr. Yogendra Pandey , Advocate appears on behalf of Mr. Animesh Tiwari, Advocate Hon’ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu, Judge Order on Board 10.11.2025 1. Petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking following reliefs:- “10.1 That, this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to call for the entire record pertaining to the case of the petitioner. 10.2 That, this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the respondent authorities to consider and allow the applications and representations (Annexure P/7) preferred by the petitioner, in accordance with law, in the interest of justice. 10.3 That, this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the respondent authorities to reimburse all the medical expenses including the expenses of surgery/implantation, amount of Cochlear implantation device for the surgery/implantation of petitioner’s son namely Adwait Mishra to the petitioner, in accordance with the prevailing rules, orders and laws, in the interest of justice. 10.4 That any other relief, which this Hon’ble court may deem fit and proper together with cost of the petition.” 2. Learned counsel for petitioner would submit that petitioner is a employee of respondent no. 3/Chhattisgarh State Warehousing Corporation and he is entitled for medical bill reimbursement for his 3 own treatment and also for the treatment of his family members. Son of petitioner was suffering with some hearing ailment of which he got his son treated from Apollo Hospital, Bilaspur and incurred medical expenditure of Rs. 19,35,130/-, he some how managed and deposited the amount in hospital and immediately thereafter, submitted the bills for reimbursement. However, his medical claim was not considered by respondent department, and thereafter he submitted a representation before respondent no. 3 and 4 in the month of September, 2023 and thereafter on couple of occasions, however, till date his medical claim is not considered and the expenditure incurred towards the treatment has not been reimbursed. 3. Learned counsel for respondent no. 3 to 6 would submit that as the representation submitted by petitioner is still pending consideration, short time may be granted to concerned respondent to take decision on the representation submitted by petitioner and it will be considered in accordance with law. 4. I have heard learned counsel for respective parties and also perused the documents enclosed along with this writ petition. 5. Taking into consideration nature of grievance raised in this writ petition, claim of petitioner for reimbursement which is still pending consideration before respondent no. 3 and 4 for about two years and also the submission made by counsel for respective parties, I find it appropriate to dispose of this writ petition at this stage, directing respondent no. 3 and 4 to take decision on pending medical claim as also representation submitted by petitioner on subsequent dates preferably within a further period of three weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this Order. 6. With the aforementioned observation/direction, this writ petition is disposed of. Certified copy as per rules. sd/- (Parth Prateem Sahu) ALFIZA Judge ALFIZA BAIG Digitally signed by ALFIZA BAIG Date: 2025.11.11 16:38:55 +0530