1 APHC010334342025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3329] FRIDAY,THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1728/2025 Between: 1. M/S SAGITTAL INFRA PROJECTS, DOOR NO 9-2-228/A, JANGAREDDYGUDEM WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT REP BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER SRI K. KRISHNA KISHORE ...PETITIONER AND 1. SRI G SAI PRASAD, FATHER NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER. THE PRI SECRETARY IRRIGATION AND WATER RESOURCES (CAD) DEPARTMENT, STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT SECRETARIAT, VEIAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, A.P. 2. SRI PEEYUSH KUMAR, FATHER NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER. THE PRI SECRETARY FINANCE DEPARTMENT. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT SECRETARIAT, VEIAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, A.P. 3. R MOHANA RAO, FATHER NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER. THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER IRRIGATION CIRCLE, KRISHNA EASTERN DIVISION, VIJAYAWADA, NTR DISTRICT. 4. B ANJANEYA PRASAD, FATHER NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT, KRISHNA EASTERN DIVISION, VIJAYAWADA, NTR DISTRICT. 2 5. KATTA SOMAIAH, FATHER NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER. PAY AND ACCOUNTS OFFICER, GOLLAPUDI, VIJAYAWADA, NTR DISTRICT ...CONTEMNOR(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. CH B R P SEKHAR Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. SOMA RAJU YELISETTI 2. SUSHMA YAGANTI 3. T LAKSHMI PADMAJA The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1728 of 2025 ORDER: On 15.10.2025, learned Counsel for the respondents stated that the orders of this Court had been complied with. Pursuant to this submission, learned counsel for the petitioner sought time to get instructions whether the orders had in fact been complied with or not. 2. Today, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. 3. Learned counsel for the respondents reiterated that the orders of this Court dated 20.06.2024 in W.P.No.9170 of 2024 have been complied with. 4. Considering the submission made by the learned Counsel for the Respondents, and since the orders of this Court have been complied with, this Court is of the view that no further consideration is necessary in this Contempt Case. Accordingly, this Contempt Case is closed. No order as to costs. Consequently, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in the contempt case shall stand closed. ________________________________ VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA, J 24.10.2025 VVnnss