Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 58314 (CHH)

SMT. SAVITA BHARDWAJ v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPC/5804/2025 · 2025-11-06

Shri Parth Prateem Sahu

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:54399 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 5804 of 2025 1. Smt. Savita Bhardwaj W/o Late Shatruhan Lal Bhardwaj Aged About 47 Years R/o Village Rogda, Tehsil Akaltara, District Janjgir- Champa (C.G.) ... Petitioner versus 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through - The Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur (C.G.) 2. Collector District - Janjgir - Champa (C.G.) 3. Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue), Janjgir, District - Janjgir - Champa (C.G.) 4. JSW Energy Through - It Managing Director, Village - Nariyara, District Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) 5. The Director JSW Energy Nariyara, District Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) ... Respondents For Petitioner : Mr. Hemant Kesharwani, Advocate For Respondent No.1 to 3 : Mr. Rishabh Bisen, Panel Lawyer Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu Order on Board 07/11/2025 1. Petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking following reliefs:- “10.1.This Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to call for the entire records pertaining to the case of the petitioner from the possession of the respondents for its kind perusal. SYED ROSHAN ZAMIR ALI Digitally signed by SYED ROSHAN ZAMIR ALI 2 10.2. The Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the respondent No.4 & 5 to appoint nominee to the son namely Bhupendra Bhardwaj for grant service or pay minimum wages. 10.3. The Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the Respondent No.2 to decide the representations submitted by petitioners in respect of claim of petitioner.” 2. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that petitioner has already submitted representation (Annexure P-6) before respondent No.2 raising grievance as raised in this writ petition, which is pending consideration since long, therefore, he is not pressing this writ petition on merits and only praying for issuance of a direction to respondent No.2 to take decision on pending representation of petitioner expeditiously. 3. Learned State Counsel would submit that he is not having any objection to limited prayer made by learned counsel for petitioner. If representation of petitioner is still pending consideration, it will be considered and decided in accordance with law. 4. Considering the submissions made by learned counsel for respective parties, this writ petition stands disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2 to take decision on representation of petitioner dated 19.9.2025 (Annexure P-6) in accordance with law expeditiously, preferably within two months from the date of receipt of this order. 5. Certified copy as per rules. Sd/- (Parth Prateem Sahu) Judge roshan/-