Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 5828 (RAJ)

SMT. SUDHA KUMARI SHARMA W/O SHRI DINESH SHARMA v. SHRI KRISHNA KUNAL, IAS

CCP/136/2025 · 2025-02-07

Manindra Mohan Shrivastava, Uma Shanker Vyas

Contempt Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:5534-DB] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D. B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 136/2025 In D.B. Civil Special Appeal (Writ) No. 663/2015 Smt. Sudha Kumari Sharma W/o Shri Dinesh Sharma, Resident of D-14, Ganesh Marg, Bapu Nagar, Jaipur Jaipur. ----Petitioner Versus 1. Shri Krishna Kunal, Ias, Secretary To The Government Of Rajasthan, Department Of School Education, Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. Shri Ashish Modi, Ias, Director, School Education, Government Of Rajasthan, Bikaner. 3. Smt. Manju Sharma, Chief District Education Officer, School Education, Government Of Rajasthan, Shiksha Sankul, Jaipur. 4. Shri S.S. Bothra, Secretary, S.s. Jain Subodh Shiksha Samittee, Ram Bagh Circle, Jaipur. 5. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary To The Government Of Rajasthan, Department Of School Education, Secretariat, Jaipur. ----Respondents For Petitioner : Mr. H.V. Nandwana Advocate. For Respondents : Mr. B.S. Chhaba, Additional Advocate General with Mr. Hardik Singh Advocate. HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS Order 07/02/2025 1. The contempt petition has been filed alleging willful disobedience of an order passed by this Court on 06.11.2015. 2. The order passed by this Court was a judgment in rem. [2025:RJ-JP:5534-DB] (2 of 3) [CCP-136/2025] 3. The respondents shall consider the case of the petitioner. Instead of issuing notice on contempt, we are inclined to dispose of this petition with a direction that the case of the petitioner shall also be examined in terms of order dated 01.12.2021 passed by this Court in the case of Shri Banwari Lal Bhukar & Anr. vs. Anoop Khinchi & Ors.-D.B. Civil Contempt Petition No.740/2016 and other connected matters wherein this Court had given detailed directions as below:- “1. It shall be an obligation on the part of the Commissioner, College Education to immediately release the dues payable to the petitioners as per the directions issued by this Court from time to time and the directions which have already been issued by the Hon’ble Supreme Court on 09.09.2021 in the case of State of Rajasthan Versus Manju Saxena & Ors., Special Leave to Appeal (c) No.13791/2019, wherein, the Hon’ble Supreme Court had directed compliance to be made within a period of eight weeks. 2. A brief, but clear order regarding compliance of the order in respect of each of the contempt petitioners will have to be passed by the concerned Directorate within a period of ten weeks from today. 3. The orders in respect of each of the contempt petitioners, which are required to be passed clearly stating compliance of the order, shall be reported directly to the Registry of this Court, which shall be placed before this Court under a separate registered case. 4. With the aforesaid observations and directions, this contempt petition, at this stage, is disposed off, however, with liberty to revive, if any grievance still remains unredressed.” 4. All the authorities including the Secretariat of the Department of School Education as also the private school educational institution officials shall be under an obligation to provide necessary information, if any demanded by Secretariat of School Education, towards compliance of the order which was [2025:RJ-JP:5534-DB] (3 of 3) [CCP-136/2025] passed earlier by this Court and in the case referred to hereinabove. 5. Contempt petition stands disposed off accordingly. (UMA SHANKER VYAS),J (MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA),CJ MANOJ NARWANI-CHANDAN /17