Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 58276 (AP)

Gali Anupama, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh,

WP/30565/2021 · 2025-10-22

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010510122021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] THURSDAY,THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 30565 OF 2021 Between: 1. GALI ANUPAMA,, W/O. RAVINDRANATH, AGED 31 YEARS, R/O. D. NO. 4-11, NEAR NERALAMMA TEMPLE CENTER, INDRAPALEM, KAKINADA RURAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPLE SECRETARY HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS AT VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT AT KAKINADA, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 3. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KAKINADA RURAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT AT KAKINADA, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, INDRAPALEM POLICE STATION, INDRAPALEM, KAKINADA, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 5. THE SUBINSPECTOR OF POLICE, INDRAPALEM POLICE STATION, INDRAPALEM, KAKINADA, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 6. NARALA GOWTHAM, S/O. SHIVA RAMA KRISHNA, AGED 19 YEARS, R/O. D. NO. 4-11, NEAR NERALAMMA TEMPLE CENTER, INDRAPALEM, KAKINADA RURAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 7. GALI SURYAPRAKASH RAO, S/O. LATE PRABHUDAS, AGED 37 YEARS, OCC- HEAD CONSTABLE, R/O. TREASURY COLONY, INDRAPALEM, KAKINADA, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. V SAI KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following Order : THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 30565 OF 2021 ORDER:- The present Writ Petition is filed questioning the action of the Respondent No.5 in not conducting proper enquiry on the report made by the Petitioner, which is registered in Crime No.312 of 2021, dated 15.12.2021 under the provisions of POCSO Act, 2012 as illegal and arbitrary. 2. Heard Mr. V. Sai Kumar, learned counsel for the Petitioner and Mr. V. Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home for the Official Respondents. 3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home would submit that after thorough investigation, Charge Sheet has been filed. Therefore, nothing survives in this Writ Petition. 4. Recording the submissions made, the Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 23.10.2025 KK