Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 5827 (GAU)

MD. MIZANUR RAHMAN v. THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 3 ORS

WP(C)/1870/2014 · 2025-03-10

Soumitra Saikia

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010008102014 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/1870/2014 MD. MIZANUR RAHMAN S/O MD. GOLAM GOFRAM, R/O WARD NO.1, P.O. and P.S. SAPATGRAM, DIST- DHUBRI, ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 3 ORS REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER CUM SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, DISPUR, GHY-6 2:THE DY. SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM REVENUE and D.M. DEPARTMENT DISPUR GHY-6 3:THE DIRECTOR OF LAND RECORDS AND SURVEYS ASSAM RUPNAGAR GHY-32 4:THE DY. COMMISSIONER DHUBRI ASSA Advocate for the Petitioner : MRU SARMA, MR.S SAIKIA Advocate for the Respondent : , GA, ASSAM Page No.# 2/2 BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SOUMITRA SAIKIA ORDER 11.03 .2025 None appears to represent the petitioner on call. Mr. A. Chakraborty, learned Government Advocate represents the Official respondents. In this matter the writ petitioner has sought for a direction to absolve the petitioner as a Lat Mandal in the Office of the District Commissioner, Dhubri, in the post of regular Mandal lying vacant under the establishment of the District Commissioner, Dhubri. Notice in the matter was issued on 04.04.2014, subsequently rule was issued on 11.09.2014 thereafter the matter has been listed on several dates but no hearing took place. On 27.02.2024, when the matter was listed none had represented the petitioner. Today also none represents the petitioner. Under such circumstances, this Court is constrained to dismiss the present writ petition for non-prosecution. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. Pending Interlocutory Application, if any, is also dismissed. JUDGE Comparing Assistant