APHC010040142016 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T MALLIKARJUNA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION Between: 1. G.LEELAVATHI, GUNTUR, W/O LATE SADASIVA RAO, 5-58 6 LANE, NEHRU NAGAR, GUNTUR 1. SADINENI VENKATA JAYA LAKSHMI GUNTUR VENKATESWARLU, R/O 9TH LANE, NEHRU NAGAR, GUNTUR. 2. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT, HYDERABAD. Revision filed under Section 397/401 of circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the Criminal Case, the High Court may be pleased to setting aside the order dt.0 C.C.No.810 of 2015 on the file of the IV Addl. Junior Civil Judge, Guntur; and to grant such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court deems fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. IA NO: 1 OF 2016(CRLRCMP 3978 OF 2016 Petition under Section 151 CPC in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant stay of all further proceedings including the appearance of the petitioner in C.C.No.810 of 2015 on the file of the IV Addl. Junior Civil Judge, Guntur, pending disposal of the Criminal Revisio 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T MALLIKARJUNA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 2582/2016 G.LEELAVATHI, GUNTUR, W/O LATE SADASIVA RAO, R/O D.NO. 8 58 6 LANE, NEHRU NAGAR, GUNTUR ...PETITIONER AND SADINENI VENKATA JAYA LAKSHMI GUNTUR ANR REP PP, W/O R/O 9TH LANE, NEHRU NAGAR, GUNTUR. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT, HYDERABAD. ...RESPONDENT(S): Revision filed under Section 397/401 of CrPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the Criminal he High Court may be pleased to allow the Criminal Revision Case by 04.08.2016 passed in CrI.M.P.No.1713 of 2016 in C.C.No.810 of 2015 on the file of the IV Addl. Junior Civil Judge, Guntur; and to grant such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court deems fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. IA NO: 1 OF 2016(CRLRCMP 3978 OF 2016 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated upport of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant stay of all further proceedings including the appearance of the petitioner in C.C.No.810 of 2015 on the file of the IV Addl. Junior Civil Judge, Guntur, pending disposal of the Criminal Revision Case, and to pass such other order IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3369] TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF OCTOBER THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T MALLIKARJUNA RAO R/O D.NO. 8- ...PETITIONER ANR REP PP, W/O R/O 9TH LANE, NEHRU NAGAR, GUNTUR. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PUBLIC ...RESPONDENT(S): CrPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the Criminal Revision allow the Criminal Revision Case by 2016 passed in CrI.M.P.No.1713 of 2016 in C.C.No.810 of 2015 on the file of the IV Addl. Junior Civil Judge, Guntur; ii) and to grant such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court deems fit and praying that in the circumstances stated upport of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant stay of all further proceedings including the appearance of the petitioner in C.C.No.810 of 2015 on the file of the IV Addl. Junior Civil Judge, Guntur, n Case, and to pass such other order 2 or orders as this Hon'ble Court deems fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. VENKATA SAI KRISHNA PONNURU Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP) 2. MARELLA RADHA The Court made the following ORDER: 1. The present Criminal Revision Case, filed under Sections 397 and 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short, ‘Cr.P.C.’) is preferred on behalf of the petitioner/accused challenging the order dated 04.08.2016 passed in Crl.M.P.No.1713 of 2016 in Calendar Case No.810 of 2015 on the file of the IV Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Guntur (for short, ‘the Trial Court’). 2. By the impugned order, the Trial Court permitted the complainant to receive a certified copy of the promissory note dated 31.03.2012, for the purpose of marking it in evidence on behalf of the complainant. 3. When the matter is called for hearing, none appeared on behalf of the petitioner herein. 4. Learned counsel for the 1st respondent (complainant) has appeared and submitted that subsequent to the filing of the present criminal revision case, C.C.No.810 of 2015, which was pending before the Trial Court, was transferred to the Court of Principal Junior Civil Judge-cum-Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Guntur, and renumbered as C.C.No.70 of 2017. In support of this submission, learned counsel placed a copy of the order in C.C.No.70 of 2017, which reflects that the case was disposed of on 07.08.2018 by acquitting the accused. She further contends that, in view of the disposal of the main case i.e., C.C.No.70 of 2017, the present Criminal Revision Case, 3 which is directed against an interlocutory order passed therein, no longer survives for independent adjudication and has consequently become infructuous. 5. Sri K. Sandeep, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor, concurs with the submission made by the learned counsel for the 1st respondent. 6. In order to consider the aforesaid submissions, I have perused the copies of the order passed in Crl.M.P.No.1713 of 2016 in Calendar Case No.810 of 2015, as well as the judgment rendered in C.C.No.70 of 2017. The cheque number and other relevant particulars in both records are found to be consistent and duly tally with each other. 7. This Court, upon a careful consideration of the submission advanced by the learned counsel for the 1st respondent and having regard to the fact that the very Calendar Case in which the impugned order was passed already stands disposed, is of the considered view that nothing further remains for determination in the present Revision Case. Since the main case has been concluded and has attained finality, any challenge to an interlocutory order passed therein has lost its relevance, and adjudicating the present Criminal Revision Case would serve no useful purpose. 8. Accordingly, the Criminal Revision Case is dismissed as infructuous. Interim orders, if any, granted earlier shall stand vacated, and all pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. _______________________ T. MALLIKARJUNA RAO, J Date: 27.10.2025 S A K 4 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T MALLIKARJUNA RAO Criminal Revision Case No.2582 of 2016 Date: 27.10.2025 S A K 86