BAL KRISHNA TIKOO AND ORS v. STATE OF J AND K TH. COMMISSIONER SECY. DEPTT. OF REVENUE AND ORS
OWP/2212/2018 · 2025-07-07
Rahul Bharti
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 5826 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 5826 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
OWP No. 2212/2018
Bal Kirshan Tikoo & Ors.
…..Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s)
Through: None
Vs
State of J&K & Ors. .…. Respondent(s)
Through: Ms. Nazia Fazal, Assisting Counsel vice Mrs. Monika Kohli, Sr. AAG
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAHUL BHARTI, JUDGE
ORDER (07.07.2025)
01. No one appeared on behalf of the petitioners on the last date of hearing and same is the position today which shows that the petitioners have lost interest in prosecuting the writ petition. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
02. Interim direction(s), if any, shall stand vacated.
(RAHUL BHARTI) JUDGE JAMMU
07.07.2025
SUNIL
Serial No. 08