SURESH KUMAR v. State Rep. by its Inspector of Police
CRL OP/14952/2025 · 2025-06-23
G K Ilanthiraiyan
Transfer Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 58245 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 58245 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Crl.O.P.No.14952 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 23.06.2025 CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN Crl.O.P.No.14952 of 2025 1.Sureshkumar @ Vada Suresh 2.Subha @ Vellai Subha ... Petitioners Vs. State rep. by The Inspector of Police H5, New Washermenpet Police Station Chennai (Cr.No.559 of 2025) ... Respondent PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, to enlarge the petitioners on bail in the event of his arrest by the respondent police in Crime No.559 of 2025 pending investigation on the file of the respondent police. For Petitioners : Mr.Ezhil Balaji For Respondent : Mr.R.Vinothraja Government Advocate (Crl.Side) O R D E R The petitioners, who apprehend arrest for the alleged offences under Sections 8(c) r/w 20(b) (ii) (B) & 29 (1) of NDPS Act 1985, Crime No.559 of 1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.O.P.No.14952 of 2025 2025, on the file of the respondent police, seek anticipatory bail.
2. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioners and other accused were found in illegal possession of 2 kilograms of Ganja. The respondent, after following the mandatory provisions, seized the contraband. Hence the complaint.
3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submitted that the entire contraband has been seized from A1 to A4, but the respondent police voluntarily roped the petitioners as they are having previous cases. Hence, he prays to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners.
4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) would submit that there are totally 7 accused in this case, in which the petitioners are arrayed as A5 and A6. That apart, the 1st petitioner is involved in 7 previous cases and the 2nd petitioner is involved in 4 previous cases which are of similar nature. Hence, he strongly opposed to grant bail to the petitioners.
5. Considering the bad antecedents of the petitioners and that the custodial interrogation of the petitioners is very much required in this case, this Court is not inclined to anticipatory bail to the petitioners. 2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.O.P.No.14952 of 2025
6. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. 23.06.2025 uma To 1.The Inspector of Police H5, New Washermenpet Police Station Chennai
2. The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras.
G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J. uma 3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.O.P.No.14952 of 2025 Crl.O.P.No.14952 of 2025 23.06.2025 4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis