CWP-24946-2025 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 135 CWP-24946-2025 DATE OF DECISION: 23.03.2026 VISHAL CHAUDHARY … Petitioner Versus STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS ... Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUVIR SEHGAL HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK MANCHANDA Present: Mr. Sanjiv Gupta, Senior Advocate with Mr. Umesh Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Anant Kataria, DAG, Haryana. Mr. Sharad Aggarwal, Advocate for respondent No.3. **** SUVIR SEHGAL, J. (ORAL) 1. Mr. Sanjiv Gupta, learned Senior counsel for the appellant has confined the prayer in the writ petition to a direction to respondent No.1 to decide the appeal Annexure P-13 which has been instituted under Section 350 of the Haryana Municipal Corporation Act, 1994. He has made reference to notices Annexures P-17 and P-18 issued by respondent No.1. Senior counsel asserts that the appeal is pending and has not been decide so far. 2. A short response has been filed on behalf of respondent No.4, however, the reply is silent regarding the pendency of the appeal. 3. State counsel is not in a position to apprise the Court as to whether the appeal has been decided or not. KUMARI SAPNA 2026.04.01 09.54 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-24946-2025 2 4. In view of the above position, writ petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.1 to adjudicate the appeal within a period of three months from the date of communication of a copy of this order, if not decided so far. (SUVIR SEHGAL) JUDGE (DEEPAK MANCHANDA) JUDGE 23.03.2026 sapna Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes / No Whether reportable : Yes / No KUMARI SAPNA 2026.04.01 09.54 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document