Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 5824 (JHR)

PRIYANKA PATHAK v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND THROUGH CHIEF SECRETARY

WPC/644/2022 · 2025-01-22

Sri Ananda Sen

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(S) No.644 of 2022 ------ 1. Priyanka Pathak 2. Aprajita Mishra 3. Nagmati Singh 4. Satyam Singh 5. Chandan Ram Gaunjhu 6. Deepak Kumar 7. Ashutosh Kumar Singh 8. Abhilasha Saini … … Petitioners Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand, through Chief Secretary, having its office at Project Building, Dhurwa, Ranchi. 2. The Principal Secretary, Personnel, Administrative Reforms and Rajbhasha Department, Government of Jharkhand, Project Building, Dhurwa, Ranchi. 3. The Principal Secretary, Home, Jail and Disaster Management, Government of Jharkhand, Project Building, Dhurwa, Ranchi. 4. The Jharkhand Public Service Commission, through its Secretary, office at Circular Road, Lalpur, Ranchi. 5. The Controller of Examination, Jharkhand Public Service Commission, Circular Road, Lalpur, Ranchi. 6. The Director of Prosecution, Prosecution Directorate, Government of Jharkhand, office at E-3/8, Saket Nagar, Hinoo, Ranchi. … … Respondents ------ CORAM : SRI ANANDA SEN, J ------ For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Saurabh Shekhar, Advocate. Mr. Aman Dayal Singh, Advocate For the Respondent(s): Mr. Abhay Prakash, Advocate Mr. Amritanshu Singh, Advocate Mr. Durgesh Agarwal, Advocate ------ 06/ 22.01.2025 The defects stand ignored. This matter is taken up on board at the request of learned counsel representing the petitioners. 2. Learned counsel representing the petitioners submits that the petitioners have already been granted the relief, for which they had approached this Court, thus, this writ petition has become infructuous. 2 3. Considering his submission, this writ petition is dismissed as having been rendered infructuous. (ANANDA SEN, J.) Prashant.Cp-2