Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 58235 (CHH)

SUNIL SINGH v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPS/5746/2023 · 2025-10-30

Shri Amitendra Kishore Prasad

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:53456 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 5746 of 2023 1 - Sunil Singh S/o. Raj Kishore Singh, Aged About 31 Years Ex Constable Trade /1117, 14th Battalion Chhattisgarh. Armes Force, Dhanora Balod, District - Balod Chhattisgarh. Permanent Residence Of Village - Piperi Police Station Baroi, District - Bhind (M.P.). ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Home (Police) Department Mantralaya, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 2 - The Inspector General Of Police, Chhattisgarh, Arms Force Central Range), Police Head Quarter, Nawa Raipur, Atal Nagar, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 3 - The Commandent, 14th Battalion, Chhattisgarh Armes Force, Dhanora Balod, District - Balod, Chhattisgarh. ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rahul Mishra, Advocate. For Respondent(s)/State : Mr. Rahul Tamaskar, G.A. Hon’ble Mr. Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order on Board 31/10/2025 RAGHVENDRA JAT Digitally signed by RAGHVENDRA JAT 2 1. By way of this petition, the petitioner has prayed for following reliefs:- “10.1 That this Hon'ble may kindly be pleased to call the record pertaining to case of petitioner. 10.2 That this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, thereby setting aside/quashing the impugned orders ANNEXURE P/1 & P/2 and further be pleased to direst the respondent authorities to reinstate the petitioner in service, accordance with law with all in consequential service benefit. 10.3 That, any other relief/order which may deem fit and just in the facts and circumstances of the case including award of the costs of the petition may be given.” 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner after arguing for some time seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition. 3. No objection has been raised from other side. 4. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Raghu Jat