Radhakisan s/o Bhau Hakwane v. The State of Maharashtra
CP/81/2025 · 2025-07-03
Shri N B Suryawanshi, Shri Sandipkumar C More
Contempt Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 5823 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 5823 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1 925 cp 81-25 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CONT. PETITION NO. 81 OF 2025 IN WP/12353/2023 RADHAKISAN S/O BHAU HAKWANE VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA ... Mr. Shinde Baliram Bhausaheb, Advocate for the Petitioner Mr. S. J. Salgare, AGP for Respondent-State Mr. Mote Umesh S., Advocate for Respondent No.4 ….
CORAM : NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI AND SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, JJ.
DATED : 03/07/2025.
P. C. :
1. Learned AGP, on instructions, submits that the government has sanctioned an amount of Rs.22,927/- towards rental compensation of the petitioner. The same amount would be transferred to acquiring body.
2. Learned advocate for the acquiring body submits that after this amount is received, the same will be disbursed to the petitioner.
3. Learned advocate for the petitioner disputes the quantum of the amount of rental compensation. If he is aggrieved by the 2025:BHC-AUG:17051-DB
2 925 cp 81-25 quantum of compensation, he is at liberty to seek appropriate remedy in accordance with law. In view of the above, since the
order is complied with and the contempt petition is disposed of.
(SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J.) (NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, J.)
VS Maind/-