Manikonda Venkata Rama Gopal v. The Adikavi Nannayya University,
WP/2327/2018 · 2025-06-29
Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 5823 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 5823 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010051932018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PR AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) • I MONDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 2327 OF 2018 Between: Manikonda Venkata Rama Gopal, S/o M. Radhakrishna Murthy, Aged 42 years, Occ.Senior Assistant in O/o The Director of Medical Education, Government of Andhra Pradesh, Vijayawada, Krishna District, A.P. ...Petitioner AND
1. The Adikavi Nannayya University, Rep. by its Registrar, Rajamahendravaram, E.G. District, A.P.
2. The Government of Andhra Pradesh, rep by its Principal Secretary, - ' Higher Education Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, A.P. ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is filed praying that . in the circumstancesstated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ or direction particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus to direct the respondents to complete the selection process in so far as recruitment of Office Superintendents in the 1st respondent University is concerned and declare the inaction of the respondents in this regard as arbitrary, vindictive, illegal and violation of Articles 14, 16 and 21 of the Constitution of India. lA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC is filed praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be
'if ' pleased to direct the respondents to consider the claim of the petitioner for appointment to the post of Office Superintendent as per Notification No. 3/2013 subject to his merit. lA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC is filed praying that in the circumstances . stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant leave to the Respondent No.1 in the Writ Petition No.2327 of 2018 to file counter affidavit in the above Writ Petition.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI C SRINIVASA BABA Counsel for the Respondent No.1: SRI GADDE KOTI NAGULU, SC for Adikavi Nannaya University Counsel for the Respondent No.2: GP FOR HIGHER EDUCATION (AP) The Court made the following order:
w- APHC010051932018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] MONDAY,THE THIRTIETH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 2327/2018 Between:
1.MANIKONDA VENKATA RAMA GOPAL, S/0 M. RADHAKRISHNA MURTHY, aged 42 YEARS, OCC.SENIOR ASSISTANT IN 0/0 THE DIRECTOR OF MEDICAL EDUCATION, GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT, A.P. ...PETITIONER AND 1.THE ADIKAVI NANNAYYA UNIVERSITY, REP. BY ITS REGISTRAR, RAJAMAHENDRAVARAM, E G. DISTRICT, A.P. 2.THE GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH. REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HIGHER EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, A.P. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toa writ or direction particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus to direct the respondents to complete the select.on process in so far as recruitment of Office Superintendents in the 1st respondent University is concerned and declare the inaction of the respondents in this regard as arbitrary, vindictive, illegal and violation of Articles 14, 16 and 21 of the Constitution of India and pass lANO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 15l CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to consider the claim of the petitioner for appointment
2 to the post of Office Superintendent his merit and pass lA NO: 1 OF 9n9A per Notification No. 3/2013 subject to as in the
“rcumstances stated LUseriT ?
°f the petition, the High Court may be pleased 2018 ot Respondent No.1 in the Writ Petition N0.L27 of 2018 to file counter affidavit in the above Writ Petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1.C SRINIVASA BABA Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1.GADDE KOTI NAGULU SC ForAdikavi 2.GP FOR HIGHER EDUCATION (AP) The Court made the following: nannaya University
3 f.
THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 2327/2018
ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: .-to issue a writ or direction particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus to direct the respondents to complete the selection process in so far as recruitment of Office Superintendents in the respondent-University is concerned and declare the inaction of the respondents in this regard as arbitrary, vindictive, illegal and violation of Articles 14. 16 and 21 of the Constitution of India and pass ..."
2. Heard Sri C.Srinivasa Baba, learned counsel for the Petitioner.
3. Learned Standing Counsel would submit that the challenge in the present writ petition is regarding their notification to complete the selection process for recruitment of Office Subordinates in the University through Advertisement No.3/2013. dated 14.08.2013 is cancelled. Learned Standing Counsel would further submit that for issuance of fresh notification for filing the vacant non-teaching posts in the University, the matter is placed before the Executive Council on 28.05.2014 for approval of issuing fresh notification but the mater was deferred. Learned Standing Counsel would further submit that no candidate has been recruited through the Advertisement No.3/2013, dated 14.08.2013. up
4.
Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that recording the same, petition may be disposed of.
4
5. Considering the submissions in the iight of the decision which has been taken by the University cancelling the subject pending before the Executive Council for i relief has become infructuous. In that view, the Writ Petition is disposed of. No order As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending notification and the matter is issuance of fresh notification, the
6. as to costs. if any, shall stand closed.
Sd/-B CHITTI JOSEPH assistant REGI RAR //TRUE COPY// 1 To, SEC OFFICER 1- The Registrar, Adikavi District, A.P.
2. The Principal Secretary, Higher Education Velagapudi, Amaravathi
3. One CC to Sri C Srinivasa
4. One CC to Sri Gadde Advocate fOPUC]
5. Two CCs to GP for Pradesh [OUT]
6. Two CD Copies Vna (gsg) Nannayya University, Rajamahendravaram , E.G. Department, Secretariat A.P. Baba, Advocate [OPUC] Koti Nagulu, SC for Adikavi Nannaya University Higher Education (AP), High Court of Andhra
.i HIGH COURT DATED:30/06/2025
ORDER WP NO. 2327 OF 2018 ^ 12 AUG 2025 ) DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS