Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 58217 (PNJ)

KOMALJEET SINGH AND OTHERS v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

CRWP/5053/2025 · 2025-05-16

Kirti Singh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRWP-5053 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 108 Komaljeet Singh and others State of Punjab CORAM: Present:-. KIRTI SINGH, J. for issuance of a writ, order or mandamus directed the official respondents to protect the life and and property of the petitioners at the hands of respondents No.5 to (arrayed in the petition). 2. submits that petitioner (Annexure P satisfied if a direction is and decide the said 3. 4. Punjab, accepts notice on behalf of respondent(s) 5053-2025 (O&M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP Date of Decision: Komaljeet Singh and others Versus Punjab and others CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE KIRTI SINGH Ms. Pawandeep Kaur, Advocate for Mr. Randeep Singh Waraich, ***** KIRTI SINGH, J.(Oral) This petition under Articles 226/227 of Constitution of India for issuance of a writ, order or direction mandamus directed the official respondents to protect the life and and property of the petitioners at the hands of respondents No.5 to (arrayed in the petition). At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner(s) have filed a representation (Annexure P-1) with regard to their grievances and satisfied if a direction is issued to respondent No. and decide the said representation. Notice of motion. At the asking of the Court, accepts notice on behalf of respondent(s) - 1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA CHANDIGARH CRWP-5053-2025 (O&M) Date of Decision: 16.05.2025 ...Petitioner ...Respondents HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE KIRTI SINGH , Advocate for , Advocate for the petitioners. Articles 226/227 of Constitution of India direction especially in the nature of mandamus directed the official respondents to protect the life and liberty and property of the petitioners at the hands of respondents No.5 to 7 ed counsel for the petitioner(s) representation dated 12.05.2025 grievances and they would be issued to respondent No.2 to look into the matter At the asking of the Court, Ms. Aakanksha Gupta, AAG, accepts notice on behalf of respondent(s)-State and submits that Petitioner s Articles 226/227 of Constitution of India of liberty 7 ) 5 would be to look into the matter Ms. Aakanksha Gupta, AAG, submits that KAPIL 2025.05.16 15:59 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRWP-5053 she has no petitioners 5. case, the present petition is disposed of with direction to respondent No. Senior Superintendent of Police, the matter and to decide the representation (Annexure P in accordance with law. 16.05.2025 Kapil Whether Whether reportable 5053-2025 (O&M) he has no objection to the prayer made by learned counsel for the s. In view of the above and without going into the merits of the case, the present petition is disposed of with direction to respondent No. Superintendent of Police, District Fa the matter and to decide the representation (Annexure P in accordance with law. .2025 Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable - 2- objection to the prayer made by learned counsel for the In view of the above and without going into the merits of the case, the present petition is disposed of with direction to respondent No.2- District Fatehgarh Sahib, to look into the matter and to decide the representation (Annexure P-1) expeditiously (KIRTI SINGH) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No objection to the prayer made by learned counsel for the In view of the above and without going into the merits of the - to look into ) expeditiously KAPIL 2025.05.16 15:59 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document