HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. 1211 of 2025 (M/S) Rajesh Kumar ….....Petitioner Versus State of Uttarakhand and others .….Respondents Present:- Mr. S.C. Burman, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. M.S. Bisht, Brief Holder for the State. Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J. (Oral) By means of the present writ petition, the petitioner seeks direction that his representation dated 15.04.2025 may be directed to be decided within stipulated time. 2. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. 3. It is the case of the petitioner that he is owner in possession of certain land situated in front of Jagat Guru Ashram, Mahatma Gandhi Road, Kankhal, Pargana Jwalapur, District Haridwar; after the death of his father, his two sisters insisted that they may stay with the petitioner; the petitioner agreed to it and his two sisters started staying with him and thereafter they started taking fight with him; now, the two sisters of the petitioner started raising construction on the land under the ownership and possession of the of petitioner. It is the case of the petitioner that he is afraid that his two sisters may illegally grab his property and may evict him from that property. 2 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the two sisters of the petitioner are illegally trying to grab the property of the petitioner; the petitioner has given a representation to the Senior Superintendent of Police, Haridwar dated 15.04.2025, therefore, a direction may be given to decide the representation. 5. It is not a case that something has to be done by the Senior Superintendent of Police, Haridwar qua some rights against the state of the petitioner. The petitioner has a family dispute with regard to property with his sisters, who are staying, as per the petitioner only, with the petitioner. The only remedy available to the petitioner is to get his rights adjudicated in a civil case. Therefore, no such direction may be issued to the respondent no. 1 to decide such representation, which may, in fact, has a tendency to decide the civil rights of the parties. Accordingly, instant petition may not be entertained and it deserves to be dismissed at the admission stage itself. 6. The writ petition is dismissed in limine. (Ravindra Maithani, J) 08.05.2025 Avneet/