Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 58207 (PNJ)

PREETI SHARMA v. DEEPAK PANT AND ORS

CR/3613/2024 · 2025-03-19

Suvir Sehgal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 295 CR-3613-2024 (O&M) Date of Decision: 19.03.2025 PREETI SHARMA .... Petitioner V/S DEEPAK PANT AND ORS ... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUVIR SEHGAL Present: Mr. Namit Khurana, Advocate for the petitioner. *** SUVIR SEHGAL, J. (ORAL) 1. Mr. Ankit Kamboj, Advocate, has put in appearance on behalf of respondent No.1 and Mr. Munish Mittal, Advocate has put in appearance on behalf of respondents No. 2 and 3. They filed their Vakalatnama, which are taken on record. 2. At the outset, counsel for the petitioner submits that in view of the judgment of the Division Bench of this Court in Hemant Bhagat and others versus Prekshi Sood Bhagat, 2025(1) RCR (Criminal) 24, he may be permitted to withdraw the revision petition with liberty to take recourse to the remedy available in accordance with law. 3. Permission is granted. 4. Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as aforesaid. 5. At this stage, counsel for the petitioner states that while issuing notice of motion on 02.07.2024, this Court stayed the Pooja Saini 2025.03.24 16:00 I attest the integrity and accuracy of this order/judgment CR-3613-2024 (O&M) -2- dispossession of the petitioner from the shared household. He requests that the interim protection may be continued so as to enable the petitioner to file an appropriate petition. 6. There is a substance in the prayer made by counsel for the petitioner, which is accepted. Interim order dated 02.07.2024 shall remain in operation for a period of four weeks’ from today. 19.03.2025 (SUVIR SEHGAL) pooja saini JUDGE Whether Speaking/Reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No Pooja Saini 2025.03.24 16:00 I attest the integrity and accuracy of this order/judgment