Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
2025:CGHC:53392
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPT No. 113 of 2016 Smt. Anita Rai W/o Shri Narendra Rai, Aged About 48 Years R/o Block No 3, Shubh Laxmi Complex, Napire Town, Jabalpur M.P.
--- Petitioner versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Principal Secretary, Government Of Chhattisgarh, Transport Department, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, New Raipur Chhattisgarh 2 - Regional Transport Officer / Taxation Authority Raipur Chhattisgarh
--- Respondents WPT No. 114 of 2016 Om Prakash Jaiswal S/o Late Shri B. L. Jaiswal, Aged About 48 Years R/o L I G- 42, Govind Bhawan, Sai Baba Chowk, Civil Lines, Jabalpur M.P.
---Petitioner Versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through- The Principal Secretary, Government Of Chhattisgarh, Transport Department, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, New Raipur Chhattisgarh 2 - Regional Transport Officer/Taxation Authority Raipur Chhattisgarh
--- Respondents BINI PRADEEP Digitally signed by BINI PRADEEP Date: 2025.11.03 11:19:07 +0530
2 WPT No. 115 of 2016 Smt. Pushpa Jaiswal W/o Shri J.P. Jaiswal, Aged About 66 Years R/o 1 Gulmohar Residency, Nagrath Chowk Road, North Civil Lines, Jabalpur M.P.
---Petitioner Versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Principal Secretary, Government Of Chhattisgarh, Transport Department, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, New Raipur Chhattisgarh 2 - Regional Transport Officer/Taxation Authority Raipur Chahttisgarh
--- Respondents
For Petitioners : None present. For Respondent/State : Ms. Anuradha Jain, Panel Lawyer
(Hon’ble Shri Justice Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi) Order on Board 31/10/2025
1. These cases are listed in the weekly list and are called on every day of this week, however, none present on behalf of the petitioners. Today also, despite repeated calls, neither the petitioners are present nor represented by any counsel. It appears that the petitioners are not interested to prosecute these appeal.
2. In this circumstance, this Court has left with no other option except to dismissed the petitions for want of prosecution.
3. Accordingly, the writ petitions are dismissed for want of prosecution.
Sd/-
(Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi)
Judge
Bini