CWP-15040-2025 (O&M) 124 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA Mahender and others State of Haryana CORAM: HON HON Present:- M Mr. Ankur Mittal, Additional AG Haryana with Mr. Pradeep Chahar, Senior DAG Haryana, Mr. Gaurav Bansal, DAG Haryana and Mr. Karan Jindal, AAG Haryana. SUDHIR SINGH Present Writ in the nature of allotted to the petitioners as per Government and Registered Will dated 09.11.2005 (Annexure P deceased-Rohtas. 2. At the outset, l petitioners would be satisfied, in case, 2025 (O&M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA CHANDIGARH Date of decision: Mahender and others versus Haryana and others HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK JAIN Ms. Saloni Sharma, Advocate for Mr. Ankur Mittal, Additional AG Haryana with Mr. Pradeep Chahar, Senior DAG Haryana, Mr. Gaurav Bansal, DAG Haryana and Mr. Karan Jindal, AAG Haryana. ***** SUDHIR SINGH, J. (ORAL) Present Writ Petition herein, inter alia in the nature of Mandamus directing the respondents to allotted to the petitioners’ family and to allot individual petitioners as per Rehabilitation and Resettlement Policy of Government and Registered Will dated 09.11.2005 (Annexure P Rohtas. At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner would be satisfied, in case, 1 of 2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-15040-2025 (O&M) Date of decision: May 23, 2025 ….Petitioners ….Respondents SUDHIR SINGH ALOK JAIN Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Ankur Mittal, Additional AG Haryana with Mr. Pradeep Chahar, Senior DAG Haryana, Mr. Gaurav Bansal, DAG Haryana and Mr. Karan Jindal, AAG Haryana. inter alia, is for issuance of a Writ the respondents to restore the plot petitioners’ family and to allot individual plots to the Resettlement Policy of the Haryana State Government and Registered Will dated 09.11.2005 (Annexure P-1) of the earned counsel for the petitioners submits that would be satisfied, in case, pending representation dated 2 2025 (O&M) , 2025 s s Writ restore the plot plots to the the Haryana State 1) of the submits that representation dated MAHAVIR SINGH 2025.05.29 12:59 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/ judgment CWP-15040-2025 (O&M) 2 of 2 10.02.2023 (Annexure P-9) is considered and decided by respondent No.2, which has not been adverted to by the respondents till date. 3. On the other hand, on advance service of copy of petition, learned State counsel appears and opposes issuance of notice of motion. He submits that grievance of the petitioners will be looked into by respondent No.2 and it shall take decision either way, on the pending representation dated 10.02.2023 (Annexure P-9). 4. Given the nature of order being passed, there is no necessity to seek reply by any of the respondents as no further proceedings and/or pleadings are required. 5. Without commenting on merits of the case, the petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2 to consider the pending representation dated 10.02.2023 (Annexure P-9) and pass an appropriate reasoned order, in accordance with law, at the earliest, preferably within a period of 08 weeks from the date of receipt of copy/ production of this order. 6. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. (SUDHIR SINGH) JUDGE (ALOK JAIN) JUDGE May 23, 2025 mahavir Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No MAHAVIR SINGH 2025.05.29 12:59 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/ judgment